Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Angus Leeming wrote:
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >>> Do we still need guiapi.[Ch]? Again, it seems like it is not
| >>> linked to the final LyX executable.
| >> I let it there because I don't know it is used in some external
|
Angus Leeming wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Do we still need guiapi.[Ch]? Again, it seems like it is not linked to
the final LyX executable.
I let it there because I don't know it is used in some external client.
We shall know if this is true or not before removing this.
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Do we still need guiapi.[Ch]? Again, it seems like it is not linked to
> > the final LyX executable.
>
> I let it there because I don't know it is used in some external client.
> We shall know if this is true or not before removing this.
You can
Michael Gerz wrote:
Do we still need guiapi.[Ch]? Again, it seems like it is not linked to
the final LyX executable.
I let it there because I don't know it is used in some external client.
We shall know if this is true or not before removing this.
Abdel.
On Thursday 15 August 2002 2:46 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 02:21:26PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > The simple answer is "I don't know". You had a similar fix elsewhere. How
> > did you solve it?
>
> *shrug* Don't know. Either not at all or the solution got lost.
> I thin
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 02:21:26PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> The simple answer is "I don't know". You had a similar fix elsewhere. How did
> you solve it?
*shrug* Don't know. Either not at all or the solution got lost.
I think I'll just kill the correction (as that would alllow me to simplif
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 02:18:47PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> int InsetFormula::descent(BufferView *, LyXFont const &) const
> {
> if (!preview_->previewReady())
> return 1 + par_->descent();
>
> int const descent = preview_->pimage()->descent();
> return displa
On Thursday 15 August 2002 2:18 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> int InsetFormula::descent(BufferView *, LyXFont const &) const
> {
> if (!preview_->previewReady())
> return 1 + par_->descent();
>
> int const descent = preview_->pimage()->descent();
> return display() ? d
On Thursday 15 August 2002 2:30 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Angus,
>
> I'd like to kill the display() function of formulabase.C.
>
> I am at the poit were it is only used for that 12-pixel-descent-
> correction for preview image. Could that be solved otherwise?
There is no display() function in fo
Angus,
I'd like to kill the display() function of formulabase.C.
I am at the poit were it is only used for that 12-pixel-descent-
correction for preview image. Could that be solved otherwise?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they d
On Thursday 15 August 2002 2:01 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 02:57:47PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> > It's mentioned in makefile.am but not there...
>
> Hm, as it compiles after a 'touch guiapi.C', maybe it's just the
> Makefile.am that's wrong?
If it's in frontends/Makef
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 02:57:47PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> It's mentioned in makefile.am but not there...
Hm, as it compiles after a 'touch guiapi.C', maybe it's just the
Makefile.am that's wrong?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, no
12 matches
Mail list logo
