Re: graphics stuff continued

2002-05-29 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 01:00:09PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: >> > Unrelated question: Why are there boost::shared_ptr<> al over the place? >> > Sort of 'pimpl'? >> >> Where. I don't have the source to hand remember. | | /// The cache contains

Re: graphics stuff continued

2002-05-28 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 28 May 2002 4:40 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 01:00:09PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > Unrelated question: Why are there boost::shared_ptr<> al over the > > > place? Sort of 'pimpl'? > > > > Where. I don't have the source to hand remember. > > /// The cac

Re: graphics stuff continued

2002-05-28 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 01:00:09PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Unrelated question: Why are there boost::shared_ptr<> al over the place? > > Sort of 'pimpl'? > > Where. I don't have the source to hand remember. /// The cache contains data of this type. typedef boost::shared_p

Re: graphics stuff continued

2002-05-28 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:02:21PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 11:30:46AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Yes. And to be able to delete the GraphicCacheItem when no insets > > referenced it any more. I think that the callback is currently subverted > > by the use of curre

Re: graphics stuff continued

2002-05-28 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 11:30:46AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Yes. And to be able to delete the GraphicCacheItem when no insets > referenced it any more. I think that the callback is currently subverted > by the use of current_view (code I know nothing about; Juergen's your > man here), but the

Re: graphics stuff continued

2002-05-28 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 03:33:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | Lars posted the http address of the boost::signals documentation a few > | days ago. If you ask him nicely... > > www.boost.org you mean? I found it now. Although I find sourcefourge a strange place to look for boost librar

Re: graphics stuff continued

2002-05-28 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Do you have a pointer to some introductory reading on signals? > | Lars posted the http address of the boost::signals documentation a few | days ago. If you ask him nicely... www.boost.org you mean? | The implementation details are a little different

Re: graphics stuff continued

2002-05-28 Thread Angus Leeming
> Do you have a pointer to some introductory reading on signals? Lars posted the http address of the boost::signals documentation a few days ago. If you ask him nicely... The implementation details are a little different to SigC's, but I believe that the boost library was built with close refere

Re: graphics stuff continued

2002-05-28 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 11:30:46AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Yes. And to be able to delete the GraphicCacheItem when no insets > referenced it any more. I think that the callback is currently subverted > by the use of current_view (code I know nothing about; Juergen's your > man here), but the

Re: graphics stuff continued

2002-05-28 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 02:39:57PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Why does the GraphicCacheItem contain a list of insets that reference it? > > Just to be able to call back if something has changed? Yes. And to be able to delete the GraphicCacheItem when no insets referenced it any more. I thi

Re: graphics stuff

2002-05-28 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:55:28AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > Anyway do you come to the meeting? I bought my tickets and will be there > from 14th to 18th, I really hope to see as much as possible of the faces > I already know and hopefully a few new ones, but as much as I understood > there

Re: graphics stuff

2002-05-28 Thread John Levon
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 11:05:26AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > There were three people in the \author section of this file... Sure but Baruch is on LyX sabbatical[1] ... regards john [1] aka real life -- "Time is a great teacher, but unfortunately it kills all its pupils." - Hecto

Re: graphics stuff

2002-05-28 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:55:28AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > Well Andre I think Angus told you that he's not able at the moment to > compile lyx so what more support should he give you? You'll see all will > be done in due time and we all have real work too, so give us the time > to react :)

Re: graphics stuff

2002-05-28 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 28-May-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 09:41:30AM +0100, John Levon wrote: >> > How big is the chance that the src/graphics stuff gets seperated >> > "properly" >> > (i.e. in some purely loading related and some InsetGraphics related part) >> > "soon" (i.e within the next

Re: graphics stuff

2002-05-28 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 09:41:30AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > > How big is the chance that the src/graphics stuff gets seperated "properly" > > (i.e. in some purely loading related and some InsetGraphics related part) > > "soon" (i.e within the next few weeks)? > > If you want it fixed ... Some

Re: graphics stuff

2002-05-28 Thread John Levon
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 09:08:46AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > How big is the chance that the src/graphics stuff gets seperated "properly" > (i.e. in some purely loading related and some InsetGraphics related part) > "soon" (i.e within the next few weeks)? If you want it fixed ... > Heck, it