Re: features/indexmacros

2022-05-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Donnerstag, dem 05.05.2022 um 04:27 +0200 schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier: > I've pushed my refactoring of the XHTML output. According to my > tests, it is functionally equivalent to the previous code, but with > cleaner XHTML output (new lines, use of dashes for > internationalisation). > Also, I bel

Re: features/indexmacros

2022-05-04 Thread Thibaut Cuvelier
On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 at 07:43, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Montag, dem 25.04.2022 um 02:43 +0200 schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier: > > I have pushed a slightly revised patch to your branch with the > > DocBook implementation. I'm now having a look at the XHTML one, in > > particular to share some code

Re: features/indexmacros

2022-04-24 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Montag, dem 25.04.2022 um 02:43 +0200 schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier: > I have pushed a slightly revised patch to your branch with the > DocBook implementation. I'm now having a look at the XHTML one, in > particular to share some code between the two. Great! -- Jürgen signature.asc Description:

Re: features/indexmacros

2022-04-24 Thread Thibaut Cuvelier
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 13:14, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Freitag, dem 22.04.2022 um 09:01 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > > > Also, I'm assuming that the user either uses the new insets or the > > > old, pure LaTeX way of doing index, not a mix of both. Does this > > > make > > > sense? >

Re: features/indexmacros

2022-04-22 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, dem 22.04.2022 um 09:01 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > > Also, I'm assuming that the user either uses the new insets or the > > old, pure LaTeX way of doing index, not a mix of both. Does this > > make > > sense? > > With LaTeX, both methods can be used in parallel, which might be

Re: features/indexmacros

2022-04-22 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, dem 22.04.2022 um 03:49 +0200 schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier: > Code-wise, the design looks really clean!  Thanks. > Also, I'm assuming that the user either uses the new insets or the > old, pure LaTeX way of doing index, not a mix of both. Does this make > sense? With LaTeX, both methods

Re: features/indexmacros

2022-04-21 Thread Thibaut Cuvelier
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 13:29, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Dienstag, dem 19.04.2022 um 13:21 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > > This adds native macros for subindexes (!level), |see and |seealso > > and sort keys (sort@key), for that matter. > Code-wise, the design looks really clean! The D

Re: features/indexmacros

2022-04-19 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Dienstag, dem 19.04.2022 um 13:21 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > This adds native macros for subindexes (!level), |see and |seealso and sort keys (sort@key), for that matter. Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@l