Re: false positive in test for unencodable preamble

2015-07-06 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Guenter Milde wrote: > I assumed this and I answered accordingly (as if you had written literal > and not literate). > > My argument, however, is that we may cosider it more useful to encode > "unencodable" characters into a LICR instead of throwing an error, as for > LaTeX this is one representa

Re: false positive in test for unencodable preamble

2015-07-06 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Montag 06 Juli 2015, 17:24:47 schrieb Guenter Milde: > On 2015-07-05, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Sonntag 05 Juli 2015, 14:12:55 schrieb Georg Baum: > >> The attached patch fixes that and even simplifies the code. Does anybody > >> know of any reason _not_ to use unicodesymbols replacements

Re: false positive in test for unencodable preamble

2015-07-06 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2015-07-05, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Sonntag 05 Juli 2015, 14:12:55 schrieb Georg Baum: >> The attached patch fixes that and even simplifies the code. Does anybody >> know of any reason _not_ to use unicodesymbols replacements for the user >> preamble? > I consider the preamble to be "lit

Re: false positive in test for unencodable preamble

2015-07-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 06/07/2015 17:17, Richard Heck a écrit : I'm slightly confused. Is the idea that this inset can go anywhere you like in the document, but its contents end up in the premable? If not, then why do we need insets to do this? Why not just have some sort of paragraph layout that does this? of which

Re: false positive in test for unencodable preamble

2015-07-06 Thread Richard Heck
On 07/05/2015 10:46 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: On 2015-07-05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: In the preamble, there is no way to make a "LyX-only" comment. :-( If we implemented InPreamble for insets, then one could create an ERT-like inset t

Re: false positive in test for unencodable preamble

2015-07-05 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2015-07-05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: In the preamble, there is no way to make a "LyX-only" comment. :-( > >> If we implemented InPreamble for insets, then one could create an >> ERT-like inset that goes in preamble. > > This may b

Re: false positive in test for unencodable preamble

2015-07-05 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2015-07-05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 05/07/2015 14:12, Georg Baum a écrit : >> Guenter Milde wrote: >>> I want a concise comment in the LyX file, in order to explain what the >>> code is about. >>> In the document, I have the option to change the comment into a LyX-note. >>> Fine. >>>

Re: false positive in test for unencodable preamble

2015-07-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 05/07/2015 14:12, Georg Baum a écrit : Guenter Milde wrote: I want a concise comment in the LyX file, in order to explain what the code is about. In the document, I have the option to change the comment into a LyX-note. Fine. In the preamble, there is no way to make a "LyX-only" comment. :

Re: false positive in test for unencodable preamble

2015-07-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Sonntag 05 Juli 2015, 14:12:55 schrieb Georg Baum: > The attached patch fixes that and even simplifies the code. Does anybody > know of any reason _not_ to use unicodesymbols replacements for the user > preamble? I consider the preamble to be "literate", just like ERT is. Thus, I think no auto

Re: false positive in test for unencodable preamble

2015-07-05 Thread Georg Baum
Guenter Milde wrote: > I want a concise comment in the LyX file, in order to explain what the > code is about. > > In the document, I have the option to change the comment into a LyX-note. > Fine. > > In the preamble, there is no way to make a "LyX-only" comment. :-( You have a point. Unfortuna

Re: false positive in test for unencodable preamble

2015-07-02 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2015-06-30, Georg Baum wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> On 2015-06-26, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >>> 2015-06-26 16:44 GMT+02:00 Guenter Milde : Please don't check for unencodable characters in comments. >>> It's still invalid encoding, since the output file contains invalid >>> glyphs (no

Re: false positive in test for unencodable preamble

2015-07-01 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2015-06-29 13:26 GMT+02:00 Guenter Milde : > Similarily, all text parts in a comment are uncritical if the file is > processed by TeX, because comments are not decoded at all. > But LyX cannot convert this to the target encoding and thus fails. Silently removing the glyphs without giving a warnin

Re: false positive in test for unencodable preamble

2015-06-30 Thread Georg Baum
Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2015-06-26, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> 2015-06-26 16:44 GMT+02:00 Guenter Milde : > >>> Please don't check for unencodable characters in comments. > >> It's still invalid encoding, since the output file contains invalid >> glyphs (no matter if this line is processed b

Re: false positive in test for unencodable preamble

2015-06-30 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2015-06-26, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2015-06-26 16:44 GMT+02:00 Guenter Milde : >> Please don't check for unencodable characters in comments. > It's still invalid encoding, since the output file contains invalid glyphs > (no matter if this line is processed by LaTeX or not). I have a diffe

Re: false positive in test for unencodable preamble

2015-06-26 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2015-06-26 16:44 GMT+02:00 Guenter Milde : > Dear LyX developers, > > trying the testfile for the comma-accent feature, I came across an > annoyance: > > With every compilation attempt, a pop up window tells me, that there > are unencodable characters in the preamble. > > However, the "offendi