Re: cvs.php / ViewVC

2006-03-05 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 02:30:39PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 12:24 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: ... > | It looks fantastic... what's wrong with the ticket system? > > We already use bugzilla might be a reason

Re: [PATCH] Re: cvs.php / ViewVC

2006-03-04 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > > I think the patch is ok... perhaps except for the size needed for a > > working copy. A fresh copy is about 270MB, with all three frontends > > built it is about 1.1GB. > > I see. I'll change that. Obviously I have write access ;-) Please have a look at the missing

Re: [PATCH] Re: cvs.php / ViewVC

2006-03-04 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I think the patch is ok... perhaps except for the size needed for a > working copy. A fresh copy is about 270MB, with all three frontends > built it is about 1.1GB. I see. I'll change that. Jürgen

Re: [PATCH] Re: cvs.php / ViewVC

2006-03-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Are you sure? | | No. I never tried it, to be honest. But if you agree with the patch, I can try | if I can commit it. I think the patch is ok... perhaps except for the size needed for a working copy. A fresh cop

Re: [PATCH] Re: cvs.php / ViewVC

2006-03-04 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Are you sure? No. I never tried it, to be honest. But if you agree with the patch, I can try if I can commit it. Jürgen

Re: [PATCH] Re: cvs.php / ViewVC

2006-03-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | (I don't have write access to www-users). Are you sure? -- Lgb

[PATCH] Re: cvs.php / ViewVC

2006-03-04 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Angus Leeming wrote: > Add an item to the news page about the migration and you can just point > people to that in the future... Attached is a first approach. Feel free to modify as you wish and commit (I don't have write access to www-users). The only thing I didn't touch is "How to mirror us?"

Re: cvs.php / ViewVC

2006-03-03 Thread Angus Leeming
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > | We should replace this page by svn.php. > > > > Name not imporant, only contents is. > > Whatever. We just had a bug report today, where the reporter used latest CVS. > I guess this is not in sync anymore, or

Re: cvs.php / ViewVC

2006-03-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 12:24 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | We should replace this page by svn.php. | > | > Name not imporant, only contents is. | > | > | Also, it would be cool if we

Re: cvs.php / ViewVC

2006-03-03 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 12:24 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | We should replace this page by svn.php. > > Name not imporant, only contents is. > > | Also, it would be cool if we would upgrade ViewVC so that we can browse the > | repositor

Re: cvs.php / ViewVC

2006-03-03 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | We should replace this page by svn.php. > > Name not imporant, only contents is. Whatever. We just had a bug report today, where the reporter used latest CVS. I guess this is not in sync anymore, or is it? Jürgen

Re: cvs.php / ViewVC

2006-03-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | We should replace this page by svn.php. Name not imporant, only contents is. | Also, it would be cool if we would upgrade ViewVC so that we can browse the | repository again (and have the links in the lyx-cvs mails again). Yes, it is on my lis

Re: cvs.php / ViewVC

2006-03-03 Thread Georg Baum
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > We should replace this page by svn.php. > > Also, it would be cool if we would upgrade ViewVC so that we can browse > the repository again (and have the links in the lyx-cvs mails again). Indeed. Having ViewVC would already help very much, I use it at work as svn GU