On 04-Jun-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| Well when I hit replay it put's just the newgroup into the Addressbox,
>| so that I have to delete it and put the lyx-devel To: address by hand,
>| other than that I see no problem ;)
>
> Then I blame your mailreader/newsreader and not my using the n
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 29-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> I like newsgroups, but sometimes I get the mail first...
>> Does it matter?
>
| Well when I hit replay it put's just the newgroup into the Addressbox,
| so that I have to delete it and put the lyx-devel To:
On 29-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I like newsgroups, but sometimes I get the mail first...
> Does it matter?
Well when I hit replay it put's just the newgroup into the Addressbox,
so that I have to delete it and put the lyx-devel To: address by hand,
other than that I see no problem ;
On Thursday 30 May 2002 1:17 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Is alpha always little endian?
Yes. However, note the comments immediately above this test. I have no idea
about any of that stuff.
On Thursday 30 May 2002 1:18 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> You should send this to the boost list
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> On Wednesday 29 May 2002 9:56 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Does no one else see
>> this:?
>>
>> I certainly do not.
>>
>> Do you have tooltips turned on or off? (I have no idea if
> "Thomas" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Incidentally, I have had to add a line to boost's limits.hpp. Does
>> noone else in the world use an Alpha? In this case linux-alpha.
Thomas> [...]
>> --- boost/boost/detail/limits.hpp 21 May 2002 23:39:55
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Incidentally, I have had to add a line to boost's limits.hpp. Does noone else
| in the world use an Alpha? In this case linux-alpha.
You should send this to the boost list as well: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Angus
>
>
| Index: boost/boost/detail/limits.hpp
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 29 May 2002 9:56 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | Does no one else see this:?
>>
>> I certainly do not.
>>
>> Do you have tooltips turned on or off?
>> (I have no idea if that can make any dif
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Incidentally, I have had to add a line to boost's limits.hpp. Does noone else
> in the world use an Alpha? In this case linux-alpha.
[...]
> --- boost/boost/detail/limits.hpp 21 May 2002 23:39:55 - 1.3
> +++ boost/boost/detail/limits.hpp 30 May 2002 11:
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 9:56 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Does no one else see this:?
>
> I certainly do not.
>
> Do you have tooltips turned on or off?
> (I have no idea if that can make any difference)
On I guess. That is the hard-coded default
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 12:29:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | ==32394== Use of uninitialised value of size 4
>
> uninitialized is not always a bug...
It doesn't say that, it says /use/ ...
It's transitive too, so if you do :
int a;
some_func(a);
it should not compl
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 09:04:57PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> Does no one else see this:?
>> Angus
>
| Maybe it's this bug that has been there since switching to boost::regex
| :
What bug?
| ==32394== Use of uninitialised value of size 4
uninitial
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | Does no one else see this:?
>> I certainly do not.
>> Do you have tooltips turned on or off?
>> (I have no idea if that can make any difference)
>> | Angus
>> | This is
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 09:04:57PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Does no one else see this:?
> Angus
Maybe it's this bug that has been there since switching to boost::regex
:
==32394== Use of uninitialised value of size 4
==32394==at 0x405F638B: strxfrm (strxfrm.c:271)
==32394==by 0x83
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Does no one else see this:?
>
> I certainly do not.
>
> Do you have tooltips turned on or off?
> (I have no idea if that can make any difference)
>
> | Angus
>
> | This is with gcc 2.95.4
>
> Can you try to investig
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Does no one else see this:?
I certainly do not.
Do you have tooltips turned on or off?
(I have no idea if that can make any difference)
| Angus
>
| This is with gcc 2.95.4
Can you try to investigate a bit further?
--
Lgb
16 matches
Mail list logo
