John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 06:29:00PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
|
| > | That is the old behaviour and that's what the patch does.
| >
| > Yes, but at the same time we want cleanups to move forward.
|
| Then help out a poor brother. I don't understan
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 06:29:00PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | That is the old behaviour and that's what the patch does.
>
> Yes, but at the same time we want cleanups to move forward.
Then help out a poor brother. I don't understand the code that calls
labelhfill
john
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 05:57:19PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
|
| > | I give up. Lars, a little help here ... the cursor behaves oddly on an
| > | empty list par as well I noticed. The patch below restores the old
| > | behaviour if that's all you
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 05:57:19PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | I give up. Lars, a little help here ... the cursor behaves oddly on an
> | empty list par as well I noticed. The patch below restores the old
> | behaviour if that's all you want
>
> I want it to not abort and not crash.
T
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:04:25PM +, John Levon wrote:
|
| > I'm bad ... I changed an Asger (aka fix-up-the-bug) into a real
| > Assert to see what would happen, but I forgot to leave a comment there.
| > Now we have a simple testcase which is fab. W
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:04:25PM +, John Levon wrote:
> I'm bad ... I changed an Asger (aka fix-up-the-bug) into a real
> Assert to see what would happen, but I forgot to leave a comment there.
> Now we have a simple testcase which is fab. We can actually kill the
> bug not do the moral equ
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 05:02:49PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> :-) I probably should have said... Obvioulsy the assert triggers.
> and that would be equally silly.
I'm bad ... I changed an Asger (aka fix-up-the-bug) into a real
Assert to see what would happen, but I forgot to leave a com
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:52:53PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
|
| > | I'm looking but beginningofMainBody() really shouldn't be returning < 0
| > | now should it ?
| >
| > Perhaps... but obviously it does.
|
| Silly thing to say. It's returning ==
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:52:53PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | I'm looking but beginningofMainBody() really shouldn't be returning < 0
> | now should it ?
>
> Perhaps... but obviously it does.
Silly thing to say. It's returning == 0.
Now what I don't get is that we're calling this cod
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:43:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
|
| > 1.293(levon26-Feb-03): lyx::Assert(last > 0);
|
| I'm looking but beginningofMainBody() really shouldn't be returning < 0
| now should it ?
Perhaps... but obvious
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:43:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> pos_type last = row.par()->beginningOfMainBody();
>
> lyx::Assert(last > 0);
> ^^
Bleh, OK, so we're calling labelFill on emptyPar. Now before, we ended
up with a last of -1. We got
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:43:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> 1.293(levon26-Feb-03): lyx::Assert(last > 0);
I'm looking but beginningofMainBody() really shouldn't be returning < 0
now should it ?
john
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| File->New
| select "List" from the layout dropdown -> crash
| Cannot get a backtrace though, my gdb is still looping.
| I get it with both frontends.
The crash is here:
text.C:
// returns the minimum space a manual label needs on the screen in
pi
13 matches
Mail list logo
