Re: compile success and a config patch

2002-03-26 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 26 March 2002 11:03 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> Note that I don't need the deccc and deccxx wrappers anymore, > Angus> but I do need to define the compilers as "cc -std1" and "cxx > Angus> -strict_ansi", rather

Re: compile success and a config patch

2002-03-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Note that I don't need the deccc and deccxx wrappers anymore, Angus> but I do need to define the compilers as "cc -std1" and "cxx Angus> -strict_ansi", rather than leaving these flags in CFLAGS and Angus> CXXFLAGS. I justified that

Re: compile success and a config patch

2002-03-25 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 05:35:11PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> And you are the guy who wants everybody to upgrade something every >> other week, aren't you? > | Only when he happens to have installed the stuff already on his own machine | ;-}

Re: compile success and a config patch

2002-03-25 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 05:35:11PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > And you are the guy who wants everybody to upgrade something every > other week, aren't you? Only when he happens to have installed the stuff already on his own machine ;-} Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in

Re: compile success and a config patch

2002-03-25 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 25 March 2002 1:43 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> Your tweak for CPP is not needed if you configure with CC=deccxx. > > Angus> I do that too and can state that I found that it _was_ needed > Angus> to find those 4 cx

Re: compile success and a config patch

2002-03-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> I have some other projects that also use auto tools, so Lars> currently switching will be a real burden. Currently, my 'other project' was 1.1.6, but soon it will change :) It is not difficult to make a configure.in file that

Re: compile success and a config patch

2002-03-25 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Lars> | In 1.3.0cvs we'll require autoconf 2.53/automake 1.6, I think. > | Lars> Would be nice if the main distributions switched to that | Lars> first... > | Lars> Has any distri

Re: compile success and a config patch

2002-03-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> | In 1.3.0cvs we'll require autoconf 2.53/automake 1.6, I think. Lars> Would be nice if the main distributions switched to that Lars> first... Lars> Has any distributions switched? Do we care? It is only a burden for the dev

Re: compile success and a config patch

2002-03-25 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | In 1.3.0cvs we'll require autoconf 2.53/automake 1.6, I think. > > Would be nice if the main distributions switched to that first... > > Has any distributions switched? SuSE 7.3 has automake 1.4-p5 and autoconf 2.52 SuSE 8.0 will be shipped end april, but there's no

Re: compile success and a config patch

2002-03-25 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Angus> I'll let you decide that. Here's the diff between the version | Angus> in config (with my patch removed) and automake 1.6's. Do you | Angus> want these other fixes in too? > | I

Re: compile success and a config patch

2002-03-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> I'll let you decide that. Here's the diff between the version Angus> in config (with my patch removed) and automake 1.6's. Do you Angus> want these other fixes in too? It is difficult to say like that... Just keep what we have for

Re: compile success and a config patch

2002-03-25 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 25 March 2002 2:27 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> The guy doing the maintenance is clearly braindead. This is > Angus> automake 1.6 where object=file.o or file.lo: > > > Angus> What should I do now? > > Report the b

Re: compile success and a config patch

2002-03-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> The guy doing the maintenance is clearly braindead. This is Angus> automake 1.6 where object=file.o or file.lo: Angus> What should I do now? Report the bug (you may want to avoid the comment on his braindeadness). And depending

Re: compile success and a config patch

2002-03-25 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 25 March 2002 1:29 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> Ok, Lars, I've finally got there. I had to tweak my configure > Angus> script so that CPP="deccxx -E", or I couldn't find ostream etc. > Angus> I also upgraded to au

Re: compile success and a config patch

2002-03-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Your tweak for CPP is not needed if you configure with CC=deccxx. Angus> I do that too and can state that I found that it _was_ needed Angus> to find those 4 cxx header files, ostream etc. Could you recall me what are the environment

Re: compile success and a config patch

2002-03-25 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 25 March 2002 1:29 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> Ok, Lars, I've finally got there. I had to tweak my configure > Angus> script so that CPP="deccxx -E", or I couldn't find ostream etc. > Angus> I also upgraded to au

Re: compile success and a config patch

2002-03-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Ok, Lars, I've finally got there. I had to tweak my configure Angus> script so that CPP="deccxx -E", or I couldn't find ostream etc. Angus> I also upgraded to automake 1.5, autoconf 2.52, although I'm Angus> not sure that that was

Re: compile success and a config patch

2002-03-21 Thread Angus Leeming
On Thursday 21 March 2002 2:03 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | * lyxinclude.m4 (LYX_CHECK_LDR): function to test if we can use > | Index: config/lyxinclude.m4 > | === > | RCS file: /u

Re: compile success and a config patch

2002-03-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | * lyxinclude.m4 (LYX_CHECK_LDR): function to test if we can use | Index: config/lyxinclude.m4 | === | RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/config/lyxinclude.m4,v | retrieving re

Re: compile success and a config patch

2002-03-21 Thread Angus Leeming
On Thursday 21 March 2002 1:53 pm, Angus Leeming wrote: > Ok, Lars, I've finally got there. I had to tweak my configure script so > that CPP="deccxx -E", or I couldn't find ostream etc. I also upgraded to > automake 1.5, autoconf 2.52, although I'm not sure that that was strictly > necessary. (I d