On Wednesday 27 November 2002 1:35 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 01:37:28PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Please tell what you find out.
>
> Bold guess: Candidates are:
>
> std::string::insert(unsigned int, unsigned int, char)
>
> and
>
> std::strings::insert(char *
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 01:37:28PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Please tell what you find out.
Bold guess: Candidates are:
std::string::insert(unsigned int, unsigned int, char)
and
std::strings::insert(char *, unsigned int, char)
Arguments given are (int, int, char).
Why adding t
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 02:04:05PM +, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> had to do the attached to compile
They are both already in current CVS.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
had to do the attached to compile
Ed.
Index: src/LyXAction.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/LyXAction.C,v
retrieving revision 1.140
diff -u -p -r1.140 LyXAction.C
--- src/LyXAction.C 27 Nov 2002 10:30:04 - 1.14
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 01:04:19PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | Why? 0u and static_cast(0) are null pointer constants as much
| > | as '0'.
| >
| > yes, that was what I was afraid of.
| > but anyhow, did you try 0u?
|
| Yes, and it works. I
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 01:04:19PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Why? 0u and static_cast(0) are null pointer constants as much
> | as '0'.
>
> yes, that was what I was afraid of.
> but anyhow, did you try 0u?
Yes, and it works. I just wonder why. Maybe I should have a look at
integral pr
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 12:46:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > can you try to change this to:
| > extension.insert(0u, 1, '.');
| >
| > (or
| >
| > extension.insert(static_cast(0), 1, '.');
| >
| > Hopefully t
> can you try to change this to:
> extension.insert(0u, 1, '.');
compiling again...
Ed.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 12:50:35PM +0100, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 12:46:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > can you try to change this to:
> > extension.insert(0u, 1, '.');
It makes a difference. Now, please tell me, why?
Andre'
--
Those who desire
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 12:53:42PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> No, that is not the correct fix. (even if '.' -> ".")
Indeed.
Sorry for the wrong commit, this went to the wrong tree...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they d
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 12:37:23PM +, Edwin Leuven wrote:
| > redhat 7.3, gcc-c++-2.96-112
|
| Just replace the '.' with "." in that line.
No, that is not the correct fix. (even if '.' -> ".")
(or am I forgetting a string op?)
--
Lgb
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 12:46:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> can you try to change this to:
> extension.insert(0u, 1, '.');
>
> (or
>
> extension.insert(static_cast(0), 1, '.');
>
> Hopefully the first one is enough. There are other options as well but
>
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 12:37:23PM +, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> redhat 7.3, gcc-c++-2.96-112
Just replace the '.' with "." in that line.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| redhat 7.3, gcc-c++-2.96-112
|
| Ed.
|
| g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../lyx-devel/src/support -I../../src
| -I../../../lyx-devel/src/support/../ -I../../../lyx-devel/boost -isystem
| /usr/X11R6/include -g -O -fno-exceptions -ftemplate-depth-30
|
On 18-Feb-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| make[3]: Entering directory `/nfs/sinco/source/lyx/lyx-devel/src/support'
>| c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../../boost -isystem
>| /usr/X11R6/include -g -fno-exceptions -W -Wall -c s
15 matches
Mail list logo
