On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 11:47:13AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 8/25/23 10:31, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 10:24:42AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > On Ubuntu 23.04 I now get an error without the following commit in
> > > master: 9715d3504c6a74f9a498e2d92329
On 8/25/23 10:31, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 10:24:42AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Ubuntu 23.04 I now get an error without the following commit in master:
9715d3504c6a74f9a498e2d9232956255110225d
Here's the error:
cd /home/scott/lyxbuilds/2.3.x/CMakeBuild/po && /usr/
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 10:24:42AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Ubuntu 23.04 I now get an error without the following commit in master:
> 9715d3504c6a74f9a498e2d9232956255110225d
>
> Here's the error:
>
> cd /home/scott/lyxbuilds/2.3.x/CMakeBuild/po && /usr/bin/python3
> /home/scott/lyxbu
Am Thu, 18 May 2023 10:56:21 -0400
schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
> On 5/18/23 10:26, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Specifically I would like to know if the component toString() in class
> > Inset is
> > overridden.
>
> https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/is_same
>
>
> > To solution for #1278
On 5/18/23 10:26, Kornel Benko wrote:
Specifically I would like to know if the component toString() in class Inset is
overridden.
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/is_same
To solution for #12783 would be ATM the attached, but I'd like to have it done
for other insets too.
Why does
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 12:04:44PM +0100, Daniel wrote:
> I am surprised there is a beta1. There is none here:
>
> https://ftp.lip6.fr/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/
>
> Where can one download it?
Well, it never really took off, except of brief tarball availibility on
google drive which is no more there
On 2022-12-10 14:52, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 11:48:24AM +, José Matos wrote:
On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 17:11 -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
I think it's ok myself. But we could also go ahead and produce a new
alpha. I can do that if you wish, when I do the 2.3.7 tarb
On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 06:00:29PM +, José Matos wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 12:28 -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > This commit used the LyX binary to write the new .lyx files since
> > lyx2lyx does not apply semantic linefeeds.
>
> This is something that needs to be done. It is not high p
On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 12:28 -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> This commit used the LyX binary to write the new .lyx files since
> lyx2lyx does not apply semantic linefeeds.
This is something that needs to be done. It is not high priority but it
should be done to keep to output of lyx2lyx as similar
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 12:08:55AM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 05:11:28PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> > On 12/9/22 14:40, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 07:19:37PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 12:28:41PM -0500,
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 11:48:24AM +, José Matos wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 17:11 -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> > I think it's ok myself. But we could also go ahead and produce a new
> > alpha. I can do that if you wish, when I do the 2.3.7 tarball this
> > weekend.
> >
> > Riki
>
On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 17:11 -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> I think it's ok myself. But we could also go ahead and produce a new
> alpha. I can do that if you wish, when I do the 2.3.7 tarball this
> weekend.
>
> Riki
If you do this (for 2.4) please call it beta-2 since we already have a
b
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 05:11:28PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 12/9/22 14:40, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 07:19:37PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 12:28:41PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > OK to push?
> > > I'm not happy about upd
On 12/9/22 14:40, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 07:19:37PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 12:28:41PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
OK to push?
I'm not happy about updating Additional.lyx as John doesn't have
up-to-date lyx binary and will stop him from updat
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 07:19:37PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 12:28:41PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > OK to push?
>
> I'm not happy about updating Additional.lyx as John doesn't have
> up-to-date lyx binary and will stop him from updates.
Makes sense. I'll exclude Ad
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 12:28:41PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> OK to push?
I'm not happy about updating Additional.lyx as John doesn't have
up-to-date lyx binary and will stop him from updates.
Pavel
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-
On 17 May 2017 at 22:47, Fan Zhang wrote:
> I was asked for a username and password from ftp://ftp.lyx.org
>
> I don’t know how I can get that. Can you please help?
>
Hi Fan,
Thanks for letting us know you still have the problem. I think I was able
to reproduce your experience/problem when tryi
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Liviu Andronic
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Liviu Andronic
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Liviu Andronic
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 09:37:26AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrot
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 09:37:26AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2015 um 01:29:11, schrieb Scott Kos
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 09:37:26AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
>>> Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2015 um 01:29:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>>>
>>> > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Richard H
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 09:37:26AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2015 um 01:29:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>>
>> > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>> > > On 04/05/2015 07:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wr
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 09:37:26AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2015 um 01:29:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> > > On 04/05/2015 07:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > >>
> > >> It is currently bound to buffer-begin-selec
Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2015 um 01:29:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> > On 04/05/2015 07:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >>
> >> It is currently bound to buffer-begin-select. But this LFUN is also
> >> bound to C-S-Home. I would like to implement
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/05/2015 07:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> It is currently bound to buffer-begin-select. But this LFUN is also
>> bound to C-S-Home. I would like to implement buffer-move-next, which
>> will move the tab up one spot (and similar for C
On 04/05/2015 07:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
It is currently bound to buffer-begin-select. But this LFUN is also
bound to C-S-Home. I would like to implement buffer-move-next, which
will move the tab up one spot (and similar for C-S-PageDown. This
feature and keybinding would be consistent with
Am 24.09.2004 um 18:05 schrieb José Abílio Oliveira Matos:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 05:52:11PM +0200, Andreas Vox wrote:
Hi José !
Hi,
I now that I'm sending this message twice, but my last message took
several hours to arrive, and I don't want to repeat the process.
Hi!
Only got one (yet).
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 05:52:11PM +0200, Andreas Vox wrote:
> Hi José !
Hi,
I now that I'm sending this message twice, but my last message took
several hours to arrive, and I don't want to repeat the process.
> I checked out 1.4.0cvs and finally got it to compile on MacOSX.
>
> I also fo
Hi José !
I checked out 1.4.0cvs and finally got it to compile on MacOSX.
I also found the Format dialog, no problem.
The main PITA was to install all the right SGML and XML files and get
the catalogs right so that sgmltools and saxon work (I mainly use SGML
right now but want to switch to XML so
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 04:32:22PM +0200, Andreas Vox wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Who is currently working on these features? Is there a roadmap or a
> list of assigned tasks?
Do you have a cvs version running on your machine?
Probably the first task is document how to make it work. ;-)
You nee
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 04:32:22PM +0200, Andreas Vox wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I would like to offer help with the Docbook XML support. My C++ days
> are 6 years gone so I missed all the new stuff with namespaces, STL and
> exceptions, but I could code some small patches.
No problem, as long as you s
On Wednesday 01 August 2001 18:19, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | ... move getStringFromVector, getVectorFromString from
> | frontends/controllers/helper_funcs.[Ch] to support/lstrings.h ?
> |
> | I think that they're generally useful (and I've just
> I hope.
I know otherwise...
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, R. Lahaye wrote:
|
| > Angus Leeming wrote:
| > > If you really, really want to have a few kde dialogs, then download the
| > > kde-1.1.x libs (only the libs are needed). And qt-1.44 of course.
| > >
| > > Does this make things clear
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > If you really, really want to have a few kde dialogs, then download the
> > kde-1.1.x libs (only the libs are needed). And qt-1.44 of course.
> >
> > Does this make things clearer?
>
> Yes! More than enough.
> Thanks.
>
> Rob.
>
Angus Leeming wrote:
> If you really, really want to have a few kde dialogs, then download the
> kde-1.1.x libs (only the libs are needed). And qt-1.44 of course.
>
> Does this make things clearer?
Yes! More than enough.
Thanks.
Rob.
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > If you want to use the KDE port (and so use the libraries) you have
> > to use the also documented option --with-frontend=kde!
>
> If I have Qt, but not KDE, could that work?
>
> Rob.
No. Also note that Jürgen said kde-1.1.x which u
On 19-Oct-2000 R. Lahaye wrote:
>> If you want to use the KDE port (and so use the libraries) you have
>> to use the also documented option --with-frontend=kde!
>
> If I have Qt, but not KDE, could that work?
If you start coding a pure QT-frontend then YES, but until the frontend is
KDE my ans
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Juergen Vigna wrote:
> >
> > If you want to use the KDE port (and so use the libraries) you have
> > to use the also documented option --with-frontend=kde!
>
> If I have Qt, but not KDE, could that work?
It's called a KDE port for a reason.
Allan. (ARRa
Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> If you want to use the KDE port (and so use the libraries) you have
> to use the also documented option --with-frontend=kde!
If I have Qt, but not KDE, could that work?
Rob.
On 19-Oct-2000 R. Lahaye wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have compiled LyX so far with XForms, by having
> the setenv vars CFLAG, CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS point
> to where the XForms files are located.
>
> Recently I noticed in the "./configure --help" listing:
> --with-qt-dir where the root of qt is
> "R" == R Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
R> Hi, I have compiled LyX so far with XForms, by having the setenv
R> vars CFLAG, CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS point to where the XForms files
R> are located.
Why don't you use --with-extra-lib and --with-extra-inc (or even
--with-extra-prefix)?
JMarc
42 matches
Mail list logo
