Re: bug 180

2003-02-03 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 03 February 2003 11:03 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> Am I right to say that there is no LyX way of inputting '\ ', > Angus> so reLyX _should_ leave it as LaTeX? > > Yes, it should go in an ERT (outside of maths). I

Re: bug 180

2003-02-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Am I right to say that there is no LyX way of inputting '\ ', Angus> so reLyX _should_ leave it as LaTeX? Yes, it should go in an ERT (outside of maths). JMatc

Re: bug 180

2003-02-03 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 03 February 2003 9:16 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> The bug: reLyX does not translate "\ " and "~" (protected > Angus> spaces) inside tabulars correctly. > > Angus> reLyX has subsequently been modified to translate

Re: bug 180

2003-02-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> The bug: reLyX does not translate "\ " and "~" (protected Angus> spaces) inside tabulars correctly. Angus> reLyX has subsequently been modified to translate '~' to Angus> protected_separator. Angus> My LaTeX knowledge is insuffici

Re: bug 180

2003-02-02 Thread Angus Leeming
Dekel Tsur wrote: > On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 08:54:51PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: >> The bug: >> reLyX does not translate "\ " and "~" (protected spaces) inside tabulars >> correctly. >> >> reLyX has subsequently been modified to translate '~' to >> protected_separator. >> >> My LaTeX knowledge

Re: bug 180

2003-02-02 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 08:54:51PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > The bug: > reLyX does not translate "\ " and "~" (protected spaces) inside tabulars > correctly. > > reLyX has subsequently been modified to translate '~' to > protected_separator. > > My LaTeX knowledge is insufficient to say tha