Re: bash completion file licence clarification needed

2008-05-14 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 04:59:03PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Sven Hoexter wrote: > > You have one now. If you need it or not. ;) It's at least clear now that > > other packagers > > are safe to pick the file up and distribute it if they think it's usefull. > > i'm no legal expert, but don't you

Re: bash completion file licence clarification needed

2008-05-14 Thread Pavel Sanda
Sven Hoexter wrote: > You have one now. If you need it or not. ;) It's at least clear now that > other packagers > are safe to pick the file up and distribute it if they think it's usefull. i'm no legal expert, but don't you need approving of both devs ;) ? pavel

Re: bash completion file licence clarification needed

2008-05-14 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 04:31:58PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: Hi Pavel, > i see some response in bugzilla. i'm not sure whats the status for such kind > of contributed > stuff. do we need blanket permission for inclusion in the tarball? > > [2] http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4753 You ha

Re: bash completion file licence clarification needed

2008-05-13 Thread Pavel Sanda
Sven Hoexter wrote: > Hi Julien, hi Cengiz, > ok you might wonder why I'm mailing you so here's the story: > Cengiz Gunay modified your bash_completion file for inkscape to work with > LyX and submitted it for inclusion in the Debian package.[1] > > I picked it up and added it to the Debian LyX pa