Jose' Matos wrote:
> The patch will catch all exceptions during convertions if a given flag
> is
> given. I suggest also not to change the lyx2lyx version but to pass
> directly the 221 format since it is known.
The latter is already done. I changed the version because I did not want to
annoy
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 12:15, Georg Baum wrote:
>
> Ok, here is the lyx2lyx backport patch. It works for me, and I am going
> to commit that tomorrow if nobody says no. The changes to buffer.C will
> follow after that.
Thanks, I will test the changes to make it more robust. I expect to have a
Georg Baum wrote:
> That makes sense. However there is one part missing, and I'll add that:
> Currently LyX sends only older files through lyx2lyx, but it should also
> convert newer files.
Ok, here is the lyx2lyx backport patch. It works for me, and I am going to
commit that tomorrow if nobody s
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | And why should them be read if they are newer? It was me who motivated
> | Lars to do this change. The argument is simple, every knowledge about
> | the lyx file format should go into lyx2lyx.
>
> Yes, that is right.
"Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Monday 06 June 2005 17:51, Georg Baum wrote:
>> I had a look at how files with the wrong version are read in 1.4. It is
>> different than in 1.3, newer files are not read at all and not treated as
>> if the format was current. The change is here:
>>
>
On Monday 06 June 2005 17:51, Georg Baum wrote:
> I had a look at how files with the wrong version are read in 1.4. It is
> different than in 1.3, newer files are not read at all and not treated as
> if the format was current. The change is here:
>
> http://www.lyx.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/lyx-devel
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>>
>> | I had a look at how files with the wrong version are read in 1.4. It is
>> | different than in 1.3, newer files are not read at all and not treated
>> | as if the format was
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
>
> | I had a look at how files with the wrong version are read in 1.4. It is
> | different than in 1.3, newer files are not read at all and not treated
> | as if the format was current. The change is here:
>
> I think this wa
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I had a look at how files with the wrong version are read in 1.4. It is
| different than in 1.3, newer files are not read at all and not treated as
| if the format was current. The change is here:
I think this was intended, but it would not be intended for
