Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 07 March 2002 4:38 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Lars, it works pretty well. However, load the User Guide and
>> (using the new custom-export dialog ;-) try ASCII, more $$FName.
>
| Interestingly, these long lines all have a fullstop in them
On Thursday 07 March 2002 4:38 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Lars, it works pretty well. However, load the User Guide and
> (using the new custom-export dialog ;-) try ASCII, more $$FName.
Interestingly, these long lines all have a fullstop in them and the space
after has been swallowed up. Eg:
t
Lars, it works pretty well. However, load the User Guide and
(using the new custom-export dialog ;-) try ASCII, more $$FName.
After all those caption not found messages you'll find in
1.4.1 Basic File Operations
...
The Revert to saved command is useful if more people
work on the same documen
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
"Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
| Lars> | Lars> btw. the label stuff is needed, it ca
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Lars> | Lars> btw. the label stuff is needed, it cannot just be
Lars> removed.
>>
Lars> | Could you hint at t
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> btw. the label stuff is needed, it cannot just be removed.
>
| Could you hint at the reason for that?
it seems that abstract does not have it set. with references it ends
u
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> btw. the label stuff is needed, it cannot just be removed.
Could you hint at the reason for that? Is it related to the strange
code to have either "Abstract" or "Abstract: " depending on some weird
test? What is the rationale
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Juergen> On 07-Mar-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
| Juergen> Does labelString have a po variant? (just a thought)
>>> Not really, but you get the same as what you get on screen
On 07-Mar-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Yes, but what is currently in ascii code is not right.
Agreed!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 /
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 07-Mar-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Juergen> Does labelString have a po variant? (just a thought)
>> Not really, but you get the same as what you get on screen :)
Juergen> Well in part you're right. This should depend
On 07-Mar-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen> Does labelString have a po variant? (just a thought)
>
> Not really, but you get the same as what you get on screen :)
Well in part you're right. This should depend on the buffer language
not the GUI language. We really should find some way
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 07-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | Why not use par->params().labelString() always?
>>
>> You tell me... I didn't write this code. (I hope)
Juergen> Does labelString have a po variant? (just a thought)
Not really
On 07-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| Why not use par->params().labelString() always?
>
> You tell me... I didn't write this code. (I hope)
Does labelString have a po variant? (just a thought)
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars> | On Thursday 07 March 2002 3:06 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I have a new patch... This one also cleans up some que
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars> | On Thursday 07 March 2002 3:06 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I have a new patch... This one also cleans up some que
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> | On Thursday 07 March 2002 3:06 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> I have a new patch... This one also cleans up some questionable
>>> code. Should be equivalent to what we had e
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 07 March 2002 3:06 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I have a new patch... This one also cleans up some questionable code.
>> Should be equivalent to what we had earlier.
>
| string const abst = _("Abstract: ");
| string const refs = _("Refe
On Thursday 07 March 2002 3:06 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I have a new patch... This one also cleans up some questionable code.
> Should be equivalent to what we had earlier.
string const abst = _("Abstract: ");
string const refs = _("References: ");
string const parlab = par->params().labe
18 matches
Mail list logo
