Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Now I am just waiting from André to add the missing file. :-)
If it blocks you, do like me: use -
#define LASSERT(a,b)
as stub file.
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Now I am just waiting from André to add the missing file. :-)
>>
>> If it blocks you, do like me: use -
>> #define LASSERT(a,b)
>>
>> as stub file. It seems
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Now I am just waiting from André to add the missing file. :-)
If it blocks you, do like me: use
-
#define LASSERT(a,b)
as stub file. It seems to work.
Then I suggest to commit this temporarily until Andre
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now I am just waiting from André to add the missing file. :-)
If it blocks you, do like me: use
-
#define LASSERT(a,b)
as stub file. It seems to work.
JMarc
On Friday 11 April 2008 08:08:27 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> alpha2: today :-)
> beta1: 01/05/2008
> beta2: 15/05/2008
> RC1 or beta3: 01/06/2008
> RC2 or beta4: 15/06/2008
> 1.6.0 or RC3: 01/07/2008
>
> So I think we can even do faster ;-)
It is a good schedule. :-)
Now I am just waiting from And
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> These things do not need to be discussed. They should be imposed ;-)
But our release dictator doesn't impose but tests out democracy ;-).
> Temptative schedule:
> alpha2: today :-)
> beta1: 01/06/2008
> beta2: 15/06/2008
> RC1 or beta3: 01/07/2008
> RC2 or beta4: 15/07
> These things do not need to be discussed. They should be imposed ;-)
But our release dictator doesn't impose but tests out democracy ;-).
> Temptative schedule:
> alpha2: today :-)
> beta1: 01/06/2008
> beta2: 15/06/2008
> RC1 or beta3: 01/07/2008
> RC2 or beta4: 15/07/2008
> 1.6.0 or RC3: 01/
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> OTHO, surely I agree with you that we should start discussing the
schedule for
> the first beta and rc releases.
Ping.
These things do not need to be discussed. They should be imposed ;-)
Temptative schedule:
alpha2: today :-)
beta1: 01/06/2008
beta2: 15/06/2008
RC1 or b
> OTHO, surely I agree with you that we should start discussing the schedule for
> the first beta and rc releases.
Ping.
regards Uwe
> I think we are feature complete for the next release,
i think this is very much dependent on the result of the current embedding
feature discussions.
pavel
On Monday 07 April 2008 19:22:24 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I read today that José plans to release it in about 5 months which is too
> long away.
Please read again, what I said was that if we take the 1.5 as an example it
would take five months to have a stable release.
This is not a matter of opinion,
11 matches
Mail list logo
