> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 03:22:53PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote: --with-extra-lib=/home/moz/bin/ --with-frontend=qt
>> so this is with your patch applied! --^^
John> Of course, I thought that's what we were t
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 03:22:53PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> --with-extra-lib=/home/moz/bin/ --with-frontend=qt
> so this is with your patch applied! --^^
Of course, I thought that's what we were talking about. I'm not
interested in bug reports in that old POS
I
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 02:57:54PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> I don't know, It seems to me that I tried it (not with your patch,
>> the cvs one) and it did not work. Or maybe I'm dumb.
John> I guess you're dumb ;))
Jo
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 02:57:54PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I don't know, It seems to me that I tried it (not with your patch, the
> cvs one) and it did not work. Or maybe I'm dumb.
I guess you're dumb ;))
./configure --with-extra-inc=/home/moz/bin/
--with-extra-lib=/home/moz/bin/ -
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 02:04:50PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> By making sure you look into the dirs already mentionned in LDFLAGS
>> and CPPFLAGS. With current cvs it does not (unless I did something
>> stupid).
John>
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 02:04:50PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> By making sure you look into the dirs already mentionned in LDFLAGS
> and CPPFLAGS. With current cvs it does not (unless I did something
> stupid).
I do that by "default", don't I ? Why does this need special handling ?
reg
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 02:00:12PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> | It is hell to maintain.
>>
>> It is working for xforms... (after some initial pain)
>
| And there are still broken corner cases. Furthermore xforms is simpler
| to find. I have be
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 02:00:12PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | It is hell to maintain.
>
> It is working for xforms... (after some initial pain)
And there are still broken corner cases. Furthermore xforms is simpler
to find. I have been through the pain of maintaining the old qt scrip
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 09:23:02AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> It would be nice if it honored correctly the --with-extra-* things.
>> I'd really like to unify the command line options from the
>> different frontends.
Jo
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 08:32:07AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> That we are going to get a lot of hassle if we do not do any discovery
>> at all.
>
| It is hell to maintain.
It is working for xforms... (after some initial pain)
--
Lgb
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 08:32:07AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> That we are going to get a lot of hassle if we do not do any discovery
> at all.
It is hell to maintain.
john
--
"This *is* Usenet, after all, where virtually every conversation that goes on
is fairly ludicrous in the first
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 09:23:02AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> It would be nice if it honored correctly the --with-extra-* things.
> I'd really like to unify the command line options from the different
> frontends.
Can you tell me how ?
thanks
john
--
"This *is* Usenet, after all, whe
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 03:43:25PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Might this do it? Angus
John> Yes, sen-san. But it needs to be done in the .m4 too ;)
John> I'm reaching the point of considering a realy qt2.m4 rewrite.
John> For star
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 12:15:05AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > | Which the m4 has no right to be knowning about. Either
| > |
| > | 1) it's non-standard in which case user does --with-qt-dir/$QTDIR
| > | 2) it's standard in which case we don'
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 12:15:05AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Which the m4 has no right to be knowning about. Either
> |
> | 1) it's non-standard in which case user does --with-qt-dir/$QTDIR
> | 2) it's standard in which case we don't need to add -Iblah
>
> depends really.
Well what
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 06:57:47PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > but of course there are several standard paths...
|
| Which the m4 has no right to be knowning about. Either
|
| 1) it's non-standard in which case user does --with-qt-dir/$QTDIR
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 06:57:47PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> but of course there are several standard paths...
Which the m4 has no right to be knowning about. Either
1) it's non-standard in which case user does --with-qt-dir/$QTDIR
2) it's standard in which case we don't need to add -
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 03:43:25PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
|
| > Might this do it?
| > Angus
|
| Yes, sen-san. But it needs to be done in the .m4 too ;)
|
| I'm reaching the point of considering a realy qt2.m4 rewrite.
Yes please. I think that it w
On Wednesday 11 September 2002 5:29 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 03:43:25PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Might this do it?
> > Angus
>
> Yes, sen-san. But it needs to be done in the .m4 too ;)
Can't help anymore. I'm totally ignorant about m4 and would like
to remain so ;-)
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 03:43:25PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Might this do it?
> Angus
Yes, sen-san. But it needs to be done in the .m4 too ;)
I'm reaching the point of considering a realy qt2.m4 rewrite. For
starters it would not attempt to guess paths. You either have
QTDIR/--with-qt-dir
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 3:53 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 03:55:11PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira
Matos wrote:
> > > Especially since moc does not have a --version switch...
> > > Or maybe qt3 has one?
> >
> > $moc -v
> > Qt Meta Object Compiler version 19 (Qt 3.0.3)
>
> Th
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 03:55:11PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > Especially since moc does not have a --version switch... Or maybe qt3
> > has one?
>
> $moc -v
> Qt Meta Object Compiler version 19 (Qt 3.0.3)
That's good news. The logic has to be :
Prefer moc2 if it exist
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 15:49, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Especially since moc does not have a --version switch... Or maybe qt3
> has one?
$moc -v
Qt Meta Object Compiler version 19 (Qt 3.0.3)
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 10:16:18AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> >you're using moc of qt2 whereas your includes are of qt3. Make
>> sure to use >to right moc
>>
>> Well you're right, *but* this is a really weired bug IMO. I have
>> qt
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 10:16:18AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> >you're using moc of qt2 whereas your includes are of qt3. Make sure to use
> >to right moc
>
> Well you're right, *but* this is a really weired bug IMO. I have qt3
> installed by default (/usr/bin/moc), but when creating the Make
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I use the standard automake tools of RedHat 7.3 and can build the xforms
| tree without problems.
Right. Me too, but I get some warnings from autogen
| The qt tree is another mater. I symlinked the binaries
| of the newer autotool to a bindir so that
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> On Mon Sep 9, 2002 11:00, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
>>Hope anybody may help me.
>
>
> you're using moc of qt2 whereas your includes are of qt3. Make sure to use to
> right moc
Well you're right, *but* this is a really weired bug IMO. I have qt3
installed by default (/usr/bi
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:32:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Try commenting out the Edit menu from default.ui
>
> I really doubt that this can be it.
Does that mean you've tried it ? Qt can be surprisingly stupid.
Seeing as the behaviour and code is so simple, I can assume it is
no
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:24:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > | Fixed inserting widgets with index smaller than 0."
| >
| > do we use negative indices for anything?
|
| For some reason the math menu uses it when its disabled. But I don't
|
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:24:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Fixed inserting widgets with index smaller than 0."
>
> do we use negative indices for anything?
For some reason the math menu uses it when its disabled. But I don't
know why or how !
Try commenting out the Edit menu from
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:12:41PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > | You've yet to answer what Qt version you use !
| >
| > qt-3.0.3-11
|
| in 3.0.5 changes :
|
| "QPopupMenu
|
| Fixed inserting widgets with index smaller than 0."
do we use
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:12:41PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | You've yet to answer what Qt version you use !
>
> qt-3.0.3-11
in 3.0.5 changes :
"QPopupMenu
Fixed inserting widgets with index smaller than 0."
It's possible that this could break ALL the menus somehow. But I think
w
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 05:53:16PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > Agree... it would be more important to get qt3 to work at all (menu
| > stuff)
|
| You've yet to answer what Qt version you use !
qt-3.0.3-11
| What you need to do is create a
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:10:39PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | These exact packages failed for Ben Stanley, I believe.
>
> after I added the configure.ac files?
Yes, a day or two ago. Maybe I misunderstood which versions he was
using.
regards
john
--
"This *is* Usenet, after all, w
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 05:54:38PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > I use
| >
| > autoconf-2.5.3
| > automake-1.6.3
| >
|
| These exact packages failed for Ben Stanley, I believe.
after I added the configure.ac files?
--
Lgb
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 05:53:16PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Agree... it would be more important to get qt3 to work at all (menu
> stuff)
You've yet to answer what Qt version you use !
What you need to do is create a little testcase using
QMenuBar::activated() and see if it works
joh
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 05:54:38PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I use
>
> autoconf-2.5.3
> automake-1.6.3
>
These exact packages failed for Ben Stanley, I believe.
Certainly I know that 1.6.1/2.13 fails as does 1.4-anything/anything
regards
john
--
"This *is* Usenet, after all, where
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 09:14:49AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
|
| > `/soft/lyx/lyx-devel/build-qt/src/frontends/qt2/ui'
| > make[6]: *** No rule to make target `libqt2ui.la.c', needed by
| > `libqt2ui.la'. Stop.
|
| You must use exactly :
|
| automake
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 09:09:33AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
|
| > If we accept qt2 and 3 why the hell the configure option is named qt2?
| > Seems not natural to me, does it?
|
| Indeed. I'll fix it someday. IT's hardly high priority.
Agree... it wou
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 04:23:40PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> PS: I am also comfused why there's so much "qt2" stuff around
> whereas lyx-cvs happily compiles with Qt3. Indeed, why not renaming
> all the "qt2"-names/files/dirs into simply "qt"
This would require a change in the CVS repository.
>
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 09:14:49AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> `/soft/lyx/lyx-devel/build-qt/src/frontends/qt2/ui'
> make[6]: *** No rule to make target `libqt2ui.la.c', needed by
> `libqt2ui.la'. Stop.
You must use exactly :
automake 1.5
autoconf 2.13
>From an entirely clean tree. No other
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 09:09:33AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> If we accept qt2 and 3 why the hell the configure option is named qt2?
> Seems not natural to me, does it?
Indeed. I'll fix it someday. IT's hardly high priority.
regards
john
--
"This *is* Usenet, after all, where virtually eve
On Mon Sep 9, 2002 11:00, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Hope anybody may help me.
you're using moc of qt2 whereas your includes are of qt3. Make sure to use to
right moc
cheers, Ed.
One more on this front:
make[6]: Entering directory
`/soft/lyx/lyx-devel/build-qt/src/frontends/qt2/ui/moc'
source='QAboutDialogBase_moc.C' object='QAboutDialogBase_moc.lo' libtool=yes \
depfile='.deps/QAboutDialogBase_moc.Plo'
tmpdepfile='.deps/QAboutDialogBase_moc.TPlo' \
depmode=gcc3 /bin/sh
R. Lahaye wrote:
> Are you compiling this on a FreeBSD system?
No I'm working on RedHat Linux 7.3
> I am, and I had a similar problem, using "make".
> As soon as I used "gmake", these problems were gone.
> Never bothered to find out why :(.
It seems that there are problems when using the standa
Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> I finally decided to have 2 build trees so that I may be able to
> help John in his work to get a working qt implementation. But now
> I'm stopped with the following error (make immediately after a configure)
>
Are you compiling this on a FreeBSD system?
I am, and I ha
John Levon wrote:
> Qt seems to get the height and metrics of things like \biguplus
> completely wrong. Can people using qt 3 etc. give it a go ?
>
> I do not know what we can do to fix this (much like most of the other
> bugs in the Qt frontend)
I finally decided to have 2 build trees so that I
John Levon wrote:
> Qt seems to get the height and metrics of things like \biguplus
> completely wrong. Can people using qt 3 etc. give it a go ?
>
> I do not know what we can do to fix this (much like most of the other
> bugs in the Qt frontend)
If we accept qt2 and 3 why the hell the configure
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 09:27:05PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Qt seems to get the height and metrics of things like \biguplus
> completely wrong. Can people using qt 3 etc. give it a go ?
>
> I do not know what we can do to fix this (much like most of the other
> bugs in the Qt frontend)
OK And
49 matches
Mail list logo
