On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Helge Hafting wrote:
If it seems like "nothing happened" UI-wise, then have the status area
proudly display something like "document.pdf successfully exported!".
+1
This kind of feedback is ideal, because the user is _not_ forced to
dismiss some stupid dialog box. So the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri writes:
I think that the simplest and best way to handle this is allowing to
change name (and location) of the exported file through a file dialog.
Not everybody knows that, when exporting, the file will be located next
to the lyx file and, UI wise,
Enrico Forestieri writes:
> I think that the simplest and best way to handle this is allowing to
> change name (and location) of the exported file through a file dialog.
> Not everybody knows that, when exporting, the file will be located next
> to the lyx file and, UI wise, it is bad that nothing
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 05:47:47PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Helge Hafting writes:
>
> > It is useful to give active branches opportunity to add to the
> > filename of exported files. This way, exports with and without the
> > branch won't collide.
> >
> > My common case:
> > I make a
I'll just mention that what I do is create a new master document that
has the correct branches enabled. In addition to giving the new
version of the document a new name, this is particularly useful when
there are many branches. For example the paper version may have e.g.
branches for Topic A and C
Helge Hafting wrote:
>> Which name (if several active branches are involved)?
>
> The names of all active branches that has this box checked. I meant to
> have one checkbox per branch.
Yes, this strikes me sensible. I first thought Jean-Marc was thinking of one
general check-box only.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I have to say that I use that too. What we have to do is to find the
correct, not over-engineered implementation.
+1.
The simplest would be a "add name when exporting" checkbox. That could
maybe be done by a change to Buffer::latexName.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Append all the names of the active branches which have "add name when
> exporting" selected.
Yes, that would work in most cases.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>> I have to say that I use that too. What we have to do is to find the
>> correct, not over-engineered implementation.
>
> +1.
>
>> The simplest would be a "add name when exporting" checkbox. That could
>> maybe be done by a change to Bu
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I have to say that I use that too. What we have to do is to find the
> correct, not over-engineered implementation.
+1.
> The simplest would be a "add name when exporting" checkbox. That could
> maybe be done by a change to Buffer::latexName.
Which name (if several
Helge Hafting writes:
> It is useful to give active branches opportunity to add to the
> filename of exported files. This way, exports with and without the
> branch won't collide.
>
> My common case:
> I make a test for my students, with answers in a "answers" branch.
> When I export this to pdf,
11 matches
Mail list logo
