On Wednesday 22 October 2003 10:25, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |
> | lyx2lyx doesn't have a Changelog, only the parent directory has one.
> | Should I add a Changelog to lyx2lyx. I would like to have all the entries
> | in the same place.
>
> either you ignore the ChangeLog message or you creat
"Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tuesday 21 October 2003 18:51, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> > Also with lyxl2lyx it does not need to be that way, as I can add
>> > the different previous value if the defaults changes in the
>> > new version. This would make easier to read LyX fil
Jose' Matos wrote:
> lyx2lyx doesn't have a Changelog, only the parent directory has
> one. Should
> I add a Changelog to lyx2lyx. I would like to have all the entries
> in the same place.
If it helps you, do it.
--
Angus
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 18:51, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Also with lyxl2lyx it does not need to be that way, as I can add
> > the different previous value if the defaults changes in the
> > new version. This would make easier to read LyX files.
>
> Do this. We do it elsewhere. (graphics, t
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 18:17, Jose' Matos wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> it is me again. ;-)
> Because of it I get:
> $src/lyx
[several warnings]
> InsetCollapsable::Read: Missing collapsed!
This one is weird since colapsed is there. So something fishy is going on.
:-)
--
José Abílio
Jose' Matos wrote:
> Also with lyxl2lyx it does not need to be that way, as I can add
> the different previous value if the defaults changes in the
> new version. This would make easier to read LyX files.
Do this. We do it elsewhere. (graphics, tabular, ...)
If it's documented, it's safe.
-
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 18:25, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:17:24PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> > Do you, and others, think that I should set the default values of
> > the missing parameter?
>
> This adds a bit bloat to the .lyx but is on sthe safe side, isn't it?
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:17:24PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> Do you, and others, think that I should set the default values of
> the missing parameter?
This adds a bit bloat to the .lyx but is on sthe safe side, isn't it?
I'd rather have lyx2lyx on the safe side. The bloat should va
