On 10/2/18 6:51 AM, Daniel wrote:
> On 01/10/2018 03:05, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>> I take it that the reason to have versioned user directories is so
>> people can have parallel installations of 2.2 and 2.3, say. But you can
>> still do that, of course, by manually setting the user directory.
On 01/10/2018 03:05, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
I take it that the reason to have versioned user directories is so
people can have parallel installations of 2.2 and 2.3, say. But you can
still do that, of course, by manually setting the user directory. How
many people do that anyway on Windows?
Le 01/10/2018 à 17:28, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
On 10/1/18 4:02 AM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Le 01/10/2018 à 03:05, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
[...]
I take it that the reason to have versioned user directories is so
people can have parallel installations of 2.2 and 2.3, say. But
On 10/1/18 4:02 AM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Le 01/10/2018 à 03:05, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
> [...]
>>
>> I take it that the reason to have versioned user directories is so
>> people can have parallel installations of 2.2 and 2.3, say. But you can
>> still do that, of course, by manual
On 10/1/18 2:46 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> On 1/10/2018 2:05 p.m., Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>> We use 'versioned' user directories on OSX and Windows: By default, the
>> major version number is used as part of the directory name. This leads,
>> on Windows, to hassles for users: When you upgrad
Le 01/10/2018 à 03:05, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
[...]
I take it that the reason to have versioned user directories is so
people can have parallel installations of 2.2 and 2.3, say. But you can
still do that, of course, by manually setting the user directory. How
many people do that anyway
On 1/10/2018 2:05 p.m., Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
We use 'versioned' user directories on OSX and Windows: By default, the
major version number is used as part of the directory name. This leads,
on Windows, to hassles for users: When you upgrade from 2.2 to 2.3, you
have to manually copy the ol
