Re: Using own bindings for automated keytest

2017-05-21 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 05:11:52PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Does your recent commit (fa3e656a) mean this patch is no longer > > necessary? > > Yes, though from my POV it is only a second choice. And realized, because no > one else responded. > > > If you are still proposing the patch: > >

Re: Using own bindings for automated keytest

2017-05-21 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sonntag, 21. Mai 2017 um 08:51:01, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 08:53:47PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Freitag, 19. Mai 2017 um 14:04:48, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 04:35:17PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > can we p

Re: Using own bindings for automated keytest

2017-05-21 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 08:53:47PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Freitag, 19. Mai 2017 um 14:04:48, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 04:35:17PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > can we please add use of an extra environment variable to set the default > > > bi

Re: Using own bindings for automated keytest

2017-05-19 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Freitag, 19. Mai 2017 um 14:04:48, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 04:35:17PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Hi all, > > can we please add use of an extra environment variable to set the default > > binding file please? > > env: LYX_DEFAULT_BINDFILE > > value: Path to default

Re: Using own bindings for automated keytest

2017-05-19 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 04:35:17PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Hi all, > can we please add use of an extra environment variable to set the default > binding file please? > env: LYX_DEFAULT_BINDFILE > value: Path to default bind file What is the use case? Is it for the keytests? Scott signatur