Le 04/07/2015 22:09, Benedict Holland a écrit :
I suppose, that said, I don't mind testing lyx on various systems but
the 2.0.8 branch is old and is in release for what, at least a year?
What additional testing, apart from that, is required? Is there a spec
sheet for various usability tests that
On 07/04/2015 04:09 PM, Benedict Holland wrote:
Right. I deeply question that logic though. The fact that a corrupted
save bug was fixed is sort of a game changer from a usability
perspective. I mean, if it wasn't well known, well documented, or
fixed, I might say that it makes sense but as it
Right. I deeply question that logic though. The fact that a corrupted save
bug was fixed is sort of a game changer from a usability perspective. I
mean, if it wasn't well known, well documented, or fixed, I might say that
it makes sense but as it stands, releasing code that has a known
catastrophic
On 07/02/2015 03:24 PM, Benedict Holland wrote:
Just curious, why are we testing old versions of an application with
known catastrophic bugs? Wasn't the uncorrupted save feature
implemented in the 2.1 branch? Also, I have been using the 2.1.3
exclusively for a long time and I admit that I am a
Just curious, why are we testing old versions of an application with known
catastrophic bugs? Wasn't the uncorrupted save feature implemented in the
2.1 branch? Also, I have been using the 2.1.3 exclusively for a long time
and I admit that I am a power user. It is stable as anything I use and when
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Ubuntu trusty 14.04, the long term support version, currently only has LyX
> 2.0.6. While it is not possible in a LTS version to upgrade to the latest
> LyX version[*], it has been decided to update to the latest 2.0.x ve
