On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 07:38:51PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
>> I wonder whether one mustn't create static global instances of this class.
>>
> Apparently not. But I don't see anything in the docs about this...though I
> haven't looked real closely, either.
>From the QApplication doc:
"Since the QA
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 01:32:21AM +0100, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
>>> As I don't touch the menus there, either we change something global
>>> drawing related or it is a memory corruption or bug. If 23146 worked, can
>>> you try to do some kind of binary search with the changes to find the
>>> e
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 07:31:57PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
> In fact, it's enough to cause the problem to add this:
>
> class RtlItemDelegate : public QItemDelegate {};
> RtlItemDelegate rtlItemDelegate;
>
> Is there something about having multiple QItemDelegates?
Nothing known.
Andre'
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 05:40:36PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
>
> See the screenshot. This is on Linux, qt4 4.3.3. I did not have this
> problem last night.
I saw this, and it went away after deleting ~/.config/Trolltech.conf.
Not sure, why, though, it's just one of those random Karma improving
mantras
Hi!
First of all, I just want to repeat what others have already said: this
completion stuff looks really great, Stefan! Way to go!
Secondly, I want to thank you on behalf of the RTL users, for not
forgetting to deal with RTL issues related to this. I see that it's
causing some trouble, and
I'll commit the fix, at least as a temporary one.
In fact with the small addition to free an old item delegate before
setting the new one, to avoid a memory leak, would be perfect.
OK. I'll let you deal with that.
rh
Am 24.02.2008 um 01:38 schrieb rgheck:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
As I don't touch the menus there, either we change something
global drawing related or it is a memory corruption or bug. If
23146 worked, can you try to do some kind of binary search with
the changes to find the exact line wh
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
As I don't touch the menus there, either we change something global
drawing related or it is a memory corruption or bug. If 23146
worked, can you try to do some kind of binary search with the
changes to find the exact line which causes the problem?
It gets weirder. He
Am 24.02.2008 um 01:31 schrieb rgheck:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 24.02.2008 um 01:09 schrieb rgheck:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 24.02.2008 um 00:56 schrieb rgheck:
This seems to have been caused by commit 23147. I have no idea
why that would be. But my fonts are fine with 23146 an
As I don't touch the menus there, either we change something global
drawing related or it is a memory corruption or bug. If 23146
worked, can you try to do some kind of binary search with the
changes to find the exact line which causes the problem?
It gets weirder. Here's what I did: I stat
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 24.02.2008 um 01:09 schrieb rgheck:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 24.02.2008 um 00:56 schrieb rgheck:
This seems to have been caused by commit 23147. I have no idea why
that would be. But my fonts are fine with 23146 and a mess with
23147. The weird thing is th
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 24.02.2008 um 01:09 schrieb rgheck:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 24.02.2008 um 00:56 schrieb rgheck:
This seems to have been caused by commit 23147. I have no idea why
that would be. But my fonts are fine with 23146 and a mess with
23147. The weird thing is th
Am 24.02.2008 um 01:09 schrieb rgheck:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 24.02.2008 um 00:56 schrieb rgheck:
This seems to have been caused by commit 23147. I have no idea why
that would be. But my fonts are fine with 23146 and a mess with
23147. The weird thing is that it's all messed up on
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 24.02.2008 um 00:56 schrieb rgheck:
This seems to have been caused by commit 23147. I have no idea why
that would be. But my fonts are fine with 23146 and a mess with
23147. The weird thing is that it's all messed up on the menu, too,
not just in the body.
Ver
Am 24.02.2008 um 00:56 schrieb rgheck:
This seems to have been caused by commit 23147. I have no idea why
that would be. But my fonts are fine with 23146 and a mess with
23147. The weird thing is that it's all messed up on the menu, too,
not just in the body.
Very strange. I could have
This seems to have been caused by commit 23147. I have no idea why that
would be. But my fonts are fine with 23146 and a mess with 23147. The
weird thing is that it's all messed up on the menu, too, not just in the
body.
rh
rgheck wrote:
See the screenshot. This is on Linux, qt4 4.3.3. I
See the screenshot. This is on Linux, qt4 4.3.3. I did not have this
problem last night.
No problem with the same Qt on Mac.
Stefan
17 matches
Mail list logo
