Le 03/12/2010 00:55, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Pavel Sanda wrote:
anything you want to have in before?
1) JMarc, there was some reminder in undo fix you committed.
do you intend to push it in soon?
I have been unable to work on it yet. Don't wait for me, I'll do my best.
JMarc
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 03.12.2010 um 23:09 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>
> > Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> >>> I think we should do something about the large amount of critical
> >>> bugs. I believe there are 12 that have a bug number of 7000 or higher.
> >>
> >> except #7026
Am 03.12.2010 um 23:09 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>>> I think we should do something about the large amount of critical
>>> bugs. I believe there are 12 that have a bug number of 7000 or higher.
>>
>> except #7026 which is already in pipe none of th
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > I think we should do something about the large amount of critical
> > bugs. I believe there are 12 that have a bug number of 7000 or higher.
>
> except #7026 which is already in pipe none of them looked as showstopper.
> would you prefer delay
On 03/12/2010 18:26, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Op 3-12-2010 18:23, Richard Heck schreef:
On 12/02/2010 07:03 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I think we should do something about the large amount of critical
bugs. I believe there are 12 that have a bug number of 7000 o
Op 3-12-2010 18:23, Richard Heck schreef:
On 12/02/2010 07:03 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I think we should do something about the large amount of critical
bugs. I believe there are 12 that have a bug number of 7000 or higher.
except #7026 which is already in pipe none
Op 3-12-2010 18:23, Richard Heck schreef:
On 12/02/2010 07:03 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I think we should do something about the large amount of critical
bugs. I believe there are 12 that have a bug number of 7000 or higher.
except #7026 which is already in pipe none
On 03/12/2010 18:23, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/02/2010 07:03 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I think we should do something about the large amount of critical
bugs. I believe there are 12 that have a bug number of 7000 or higher.
except #7026 which is already in pipe none o
On 12/02/2010 07:03 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I think we should do something about the large amount of critical
bugs. I believe there are 12 that have a bug number of 7000 or higher.
except #7026 which is already in pipe none of them looked as showstopper.
would you p
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> I think we should do something about the large amount of critical
> bugs. I believe there are 12 that have a bug number of 7000 or higher.
except #7026 which is already in pipe none of them looked as showstopper.
would you prefer delay +1 week? or freeze except for
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> anything you want to have in before?
>
> 1) JMarc, there was some reminder in undo fix you committed.
> do you intend to push it in soon?
> 2) Georg wrote patch for #7071. somebody who see into ReferenceCache
> can per
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> anything you want to have in before?
1) JMarc, there was some reminder in undo fix you committed.
do you intend to push it in soon?
2) Georg wrote patch for #7071. somebody who see into ReferenceCache
can perhaps commit it (or give ok in trac, so Georg can proceed)?
my
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 02.12.2010 um 19:53 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>
> > Stephan Witt wrote:
> >> Now I did the aspell backend changes.
> >> The complete patch (aspell+hunspell) is attached.
> >> I'm ready to commit it.
> >
> > i'm afraid the review is not going to happen, so wait tonight and comm
Am 02.12.2010 um 19:53 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Now I did the aspell backend changes.
>> The complete patch (aspell+hunspell) is attached.
>> I'm ready to commit it.
>
> i'm afraid the review is not going to happen, so wait tonight and commit it
> tommorrow...
Sorry, 30 sec
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Now I did the aspell backend changes.
> The complete patch (aspell+hunspell) is attached.
> I'm ready to commit it.
i'm afraid the review is not going to happen, so wait tonight and commit it
tommorrow...
pavel
Am 02.12.2010 um 03:53 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> I've a personal dictionary solution for hunspell ready.
>>
>> This is the patch for having a personal word list with hunspell.
>> It makes "Add to personal dictionary" and "Remove from personal dictionary"
>> working.
>>
>> I
Stephan Witt wrote:
> > I've a personal dictionary solution for hunspell ready.
>
> This is the patch for having a personal word list with hunspell.
> It makes "Add to personal dictionary" and "Remove from personal dictionary"
> working.
>
> If it's ok I want to use it for aspell next...
i cant
Am 30.11.2010 um 17:07 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 30.11.2010 um 02:14 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>
>> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>> hi,
>>>
>>
>> end of this week would be good time to make tarball with beta 2,
>> we need to push the latest changes in xe/lua/tex out for testing.
>>
>> anything you want to
Am 30.11.2010 um 02:14 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>
> end of this week would be good time to make tarball with beta 2,
> we need to push the latest changes in xe/lua/tex out for testing.
>
> anything you want to have in before?
I've a personal dictionary solution for h
On 11/29/10 8:14 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
once beta2 is out we should try to sort out bugs which
1) will have killed 2.0 milestone,
2) which need normal fixes
3) and bugs which seem to have non trivial fixes or are prone to introduce new
regression while fixing them.
once 3) are gone we can star
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> hi,
>
many regressions killed, thanks. these two remain:
> tabular bugs: 7021
>
> 7072 (undo&auto completion)
end of this week would be good time to make tarball with beta 2,
we need to push the latest changes in xe/lua/tex out for testing.
anything you want to have in b
On 11/26/2010 04:34 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
fileformat change - #2607 (conversion of Labeling --> List)
Richard produced some patch, Juergen, are you fine with it?
Yes.
Bug #2607 has been fixed in trunk.
rh
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> fileformat change - #2607 (conversion of Labeling --> List)
> Richard produced some patch, Juergen, are you fine with it?
Yes.
Jürgen
> and #7035 (RCS ci fails) - Vincent you have different patch than Stephan
> proposed?
>
> pavel
>
Fixed at r36497.
Vincent
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> hi,
>
> the newest changes in xetex are now in, the same almost holds for luatex -
> so its time to start think about beta2 to test these changes.
>
> i would like that some portion of regressions disappears too, so here is
> the updated list of regression bugs:
>
> tabular
25 matches
Mail list logo
