Am 11.04.2011 um 00:44 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> time to land. optmistic plan is RC3 on 11.4. let us hope RC4~20, final
> ~27.
i would like to make soft freeze at friday night and let only docs and
translations.
sunday night i would prepare RC3 tarb
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > > time to land. optmistic plan is RC3 on 11.4. let us hope RC4~20, final
> > > > ~27.
> > >
> > > i would like to make soft freeze at friday night and let only docs and
> > > translations.
> > > sunday night i would prepare RC3 tarballs.
>
> trunk is frozen now, prepari
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > time to land. optmistic plan is RC3 on 11.4. let us hope RC4~20, final
> > > ~27.
> >
> > i would like to make soft freeze at friday night and let only docs and
> > translations.
> > sunday night i would prepare RC3 tarballs.
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > time to land. optmistic plan is RC3 on 11.4. let us hope RC4~20, final ~27.
>
> i would like to make soft freeze at friday night and let only docs and
> translations.
> sunday night i would prepare RC3 tarballs.
we are entering soft freeze for RC3.
fro
On 04/07/2011 06:37 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
time to land. optmistic plan is RC3 on 11.4. let us hope RC4~20, final ~27.
i would like to make soft freeze at friday night and let only docs and
translations.
sunday night i would prepare RC3 tarballs.
Sounds reasonable.
rh
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> time to land. optmistic plan is RC3 on 11.4. let us hope RC4~20, final ~27.
i would like to make soft freeze at friday night and let only docs and
translations.
sunday night i would prepare RC3 tarballs.
pavel
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> As soon as the file format of 2.0 is frozen (is it now?)
its frozen for new features, but if some bug appears its can be still
incremented,
ie frozen will be when 2.0.0 is released and iirc the lyx2lyx stuff for older
branch
was usually done after the fresh new realea
Richard Heck wrote:
> I will take care of this when the time comes.
Thanks!
> Jurgen, I assume I can just copy the relevant files over?
I think so, yes. But I'm not absolutely sure. I never did this step myself.
Jürgen
On 04/03/2011 05:25 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
hi,
time to land. optmistic plan is RC3 on 11.4. let us hope RC4~20, final ~27.
- we must make string freeze very soon so translators have some time
to consolidate .po files and documentation. anybody around still have
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > from now on please any untrivial code must firstly go through devel list
> > and have nod from at least one another developer.
>
> This one is probably untrivial -- it removes some more files produced in the
> LuaTeX test of configure.py.
go
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> This one is probably untrivial
I meant *trivial*, of course.
Jürgen
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> from now on please any untrivial code must firstly go through devel list
> and have nod from at least one another developer.
This one is probably untrivial -- it removes some more files produced in the
LuaTeX test of configure.py.
Jürgen
Index: lib/configure.py
=
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> hi,
>
> time to land. optmistic plan is RC3 on 11.4. let us hope RC4~20, final ~27.
>
> - we must make string freeze very soon so translators have some time
> to consolidate .po files and documentation. anybody around still have
> something in pipe which introduce new str
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> > we have 2 critical and 2 major bugs, i'm concerned mostly about file
> > corruption bug (#7371). its also in 1.6 and there are signals that it
> > could be connected to new Qts - we should try to catch this before the
> > last 1.6.10 is out
>
> Are you sure #7371 is als
On 01.04.2011 00:14, Pavel Sanda wrote:
we have 2 critical and 2 major bugs, i'm concerned mostly about file corruption
bug (#7371). its also in 1.6 and there are signals that it could be connected
to new Qts - we should try to catch this before the last 1.6.10 is out
Are you sure #7371 i
venom00 wrote:
> Mmmh, I agree with you for my last patch, but the old one (enabling PSTricks
> and
> TikZ) is an important improvement and it's in LyX 2.0 since beta2. I think we
> also announced PSTricks and TikZ support in beta2.
i didn't mean that the code shouldn't go in, but rather that i s
> - the movement of code (particularly around formats, preview,
> etc) in trunk
> is way to dynamic to my taste in last days and we should
> pick up again
> the habit from last 1.6 RC series.
Mmmh, I agree with you for my last patch, but the old one (enabling PSTricks and
TikZ) is an importa
17 matches
Mail list logo