> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Allan> Buried in amongst the rhetoric were a few valid complaints
Allan> although they weren't necessarily expressed well.
Actually, things got better after some time.
Allan> 1. We should only show font info for changes from the layout
Alla
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Larry Kollar wrote:
> Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Those of you who don't read newsgroups might nonetheless like to scan
> > the following thread, which mentions LyX (Andre and Lars and I defend
> > it to the death ;)
> >
> >
>http://groups.google.com/groups?h
Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Those of you who don't read newsgroups might nonetheless like to scan
> the following thread, which mentions LyX (Andre and Lars and I defend
> it to the death ;)
>
>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&threadm=3C681D71.8E9BF939%40active-tex.demon.co.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 03:28:15PM +, Jules Bean wrote:
>
>>>But the two of you spoiled all the fun ;-}
>>>
>>How? What did we do?
>>
>
> You told him about my relation to mathed. I was already promoted to a
> 'seasoned LyX user' by David - which I am certainly not
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 03:28:15PM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> > But the two of you spoiled all the fun ;-}
>
> How? What did we do?
You told him about my relation to mathed. I was already promoted to a
'seasoned LyX user' by David - which I am certainly not. I have not _used_
LyX too much (sinc
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 03:08:46PM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> But it's also giving LyX some pretty good publicity, and giving Andre
> and myself a platform from which to evangelise about how much better
> 1.2 is going to be for the maths community (which appear to comprise a
> majority in comp.tex
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 04:26:16PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 04:50:46PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Interesting thread... at least for the amount of gratuitous
> > agressivity LyX can get :)
>
> But the two of you spoiled all the fun ;-}
How? What did we d
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 04:50:46PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Interesting thread... at least for the amount of gratuitous
> agressivity LyX can get :)
But the two of you spoiled all the fun ;-}
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jules Bean wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 04:50:46PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>>>"Jules" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>Jules> Those of you who don't read newsgroups might nonetheless like
>>Jules> to scan the following thread, which mentions LyX (Andre and
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 04:50:46PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Jules" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jules> Those of you who don't read newsgroups might nonetheless like
> Jules> to scan the following thread, which mentions LyX (Andre and
> Jules> Lars and I defend
> "Jules" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jules> Those of you who don't read newsgroups might nonetheless like
Jules> to scan the following thread, which mentions LyX (Andre and
Jules> Lars and I defend it to the death ;)
Interesting thread... at least for the amount of gratuitous
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 12:42:47PM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> Those of you who don't read newsgroups might nonetheless like to scan
> the following thread, which mentions LyX (Andre and Lars and I defend
> it to the death ;)
No need to die for. If only recompilation time weren't that long...
And
12 matches
Mail list logo
