Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Sure we have a bugs that would benefit from a OS field, but that can be
> noted in
> decsription and comments as well.
Sure.
Jürgen
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:17, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > > However, AFAICS trac does not feature "Platform" and "OS"
> specifications.
> > > Will
> > > this (IMO important) data be lost after the transformation? And are you
> > > aware
> > > of other data types th
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > However, AFAICS trac does not feature "Platform" and "OS" specifications.
> > Will
> > this (IMO important) data be lost after the transformation? And are you
> > aware
> > of other data types that are not supported?
>
> Yes, some info will be lost, other info move fr
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:49, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > After a number of false starts fixup and re-converts I have no passed the
> > 1071 bugs converted mark, but I guess I will still have to add more
> fixups
> > and workarounds.
> >
> > I really hope the end r
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> After a number of false starts fixup and re-converts I have no passed the
> 1071 bugs converted mark, but I guess I will still have to add more fixups
> and workarounds.
>
> I really hope the end result will be acceptable.
On a first glance, the intermediate result loo
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 17:39, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 16:37, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 15:54, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 15:33, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>>
After a number of false st
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 16:37, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 15:54, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 15:33, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> After a number of false starts fixup and re-converts I have no passed the
>>> 1071 bugs converted ma
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 15:54, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 15:33, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>
>> After a number of false starts fixup and re-converts I have no passed the
>> 1071 bugs converted mark, but I guess I will still have to add more fixups
>> and workarounds
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 15:33, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> After a number of false starts fixup and re-converts I have no passed the
> 1071 bugs converted mark, but I guess I will still have to add more fixups
> and workarounds.
>
Up to 1745 now.
--
Lgb
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 15:22, rgheck wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:30, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 18:52, rgheck wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Glad to see that's back. What are the plans for bugzilla now?
>>> My p
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:30, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 18:52, rgheck wrote:
Glad to see that's back. What are the plans for bugzilla now?
My plan is to get aussie moved to my place before doing anything.
Preferrable I'd l
I am trying to get the bugzilla moved to trac now, so perhaps I can
have it
up and
working today if all goes well.
/me crossing fingers
JMarc
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:30, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 18:52, rgheck wrote:
>
>>
>> Glad to see that's back. What are the plans for bugzilla now?
>
>
> My plan is to get aussie moved to my place before doing anything.
> Preferrable I'd like to do nothing with bug
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 18:52, rgheck wrote:
>
> Glad to see that's back. What are the plans for bugzilla now?
My plan is to get aussie moved to my place before doing anything.
Preferrable I'd like to do nothing with bugzilla.
I would have preffered a move to trac for the bug issues, but conve
14 matches
Mail list logo
