Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:31:56PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
- TextClassPtr newClass(TextClass const & baseClass);
+ DocumentClass * newClass(TextClass const & baseClass);
I'd prefer a reference her... otherwise it somehow make me wonder
whether ownership is
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:31:56PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
> - TextClassPtr newClass(TextClass const & baseClass);
> + DocumentClass * newClass(TextClass const & baseClass);
I'd prefer a reference her... otherwise it somehow make me wonder
whether ownership is passed or not...
> /// \r
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 04:46:44PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Does anybody remember why we use a shared pointer and not an index into
the global list of textclasses?
Yes, that was my doing.
So this is a recent change?
A few months
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 04:46:44PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> Does anybody remember why we use a shared pointer and not an index into
>> the global list of textclasses?
>
> Yes, that was my doing.
So this is a recent change?
> It used to be a list of textclasses, when these we
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Does anybody remember why we use a shared pointer and not an index into
the global list of textclasses?
Yes, that was my doing. It used to be a list of textclasses, when these
were static objects. But now the textclasses that are in use are dynamic
objects: They get cha
