Stephan Witt wrote:
> After applying the patches I get:
>
> $ (cd lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev;ctest -C debug -R tex2lyx)
> Test project /Users/stephan/git/lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev
>
> …
>
> 86% tests passed, 4 tests failed out of 28
>
> Label Time Summary:
> cmplyx = 21.45 sec (14 tests)
>
Am 29.01.2016 um 22:15 schrieb Georg Baum :
>
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> Am 24.01.2016 um 19:08 schrieb Georg Baum
>> :
>>>
>>> This is the idea, yes, but before implementing it I'd like to know
>>> whether it works in principle. This would require a two step approach for
>>> the case that no co
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 24.01.2016 um 19:08 schrieb Georg Baum
> :
>>
>> This is the idea, yes, but before implementing it I'd like to know
>> whether it works in principle. This would require a two step approach for
>> the case that no command line option is given: Parse in latin1 encoding
>> u
Am 24.01.2016 um 19:08 schrieb Georg Baum :
>
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> Am 24.01.2016 um 18:17 schrieb Georg Baum
>> :
>>>
>>> Stephan, does the algo2e.tex test succeed if you apply the attached patch
>>> on a clean tree?
>>
>> No, it doesn’t work. With the patch I get:
>
> It turned out that
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 06:17:18PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > Do I understand correctly that this issue is no longer a beta blocker or
> > is there still something that needs to be done here before beta?
>
> The original reason why I viewed it as beta blocker (general
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 24.01.2016 um 18:17 schrieb Georg Baum
> :
>>
>> Stephan, does the algo2e.tex test succeed if you apply the attached patch
>> on a clean tree?
>
> No, it doesn’t work. With the patch I get:
It turned out that we used two different names for the latin1 encoding:
"ISO885
Am 24.01.2016 um 18:17 schrieb Georg Baum :
>
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
>> Do I understand correctly that this issue is no longer a beta blocker or
>> is there still something that needs to be done here before beta?
>
> The original reason why I viewed it as beta blocker (general user or sytem
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Do I understand correctly that this issue is no longer a beta blocker or
> is there still something that needs to be done here before beta?
The original reason why I viewed it as beta blocker (general user or sytem
directory problems) turned out to be wrong.
I would not
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 03:36:09PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> OK, but I don't think it is too important to know whether the old compiler
> did handle that. There is a FIXME near the imbue call anyway, since we do
> not know whether it is standard conforming what we do there.
>
> I'll have a loo
Stephan Witt wrote:
> For latin1 documents (e.g. algo2e.tex) it works better. The test now
> passed.
>
> For CJK.lex it’s obviously a problem:
> $ /Users/stephan/git/lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/bin/Debug/tex2lyx -f
> -roundtrip /Users/stephan/git/lyx/src/tex2lyx/test/CJK.tex
> /Users/stephan/git/lyx
Am 24.01.2016 um 15:07 schrieb Georg Baum :
>
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> Yes, we shouldn’t change that on the fly. If we change it we have to
>> provide a migration path to copy the current contents to the new location.
>> Not very difficult but a change in configure.py would be required.
>>
>>
Am 24.01.2016 um 14:50 schrieb Georg Baum :
>
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> Am 24.01.2016 um 13:00 schrieb Stephan Witt :
>> I’ve tried to follow the tokenizing and parsing program flow.
>>
>> While processing the „latin1“ option of „inputenc“ the encoding of
>> the idocstream is changed. (Line 395
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Yes, we shouldn’t change that on the fly. If we change it we have to
> provide a migration path to copy the current contents to the new location.
> Not very difficult but a change in configure.py would be required.
>
> Since we don’t want to use different settings for Lyx, t
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 24.01.2016 um 13:00 schrieb Stephan Witt :
> I’ve tried to follow the tokenizing and parsing program flow.
>
> While processing the „latin1“ option of „inputenc“ the encoding of
> the idocstream is changed. (Line 395 of support/docstream.cpp is called)
>
> Perhaps this i
Am 24.01.2016 um 13:00 schrieb Stephan Witt :
>
> Am 24.01.2016 um 12:12 schrieb Georg Baum :
>>
>> Stephan Witt wrote:
>>
>>> You are asking for running tex2lyx in the debugger? Yes, I’m able to do
>>> so. What should I try exactly?
>>>
>>> I started tex2lyx in debugger with these options:
>>>
Am 24.01.2016 um 12:12 schrieb Georg Baum :
>
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> You are asking for running tex2lyx in the debugger? Yes, I’m able to do
>> so. What should I try exactly?
>>
>> I started tex2lyx in debugger with these options:
>> -f
>> -roundtrip
>> /Users/stephan/git/lyx/src/tex2lyx/tes
Am 24.01.2016 um 12:02 schrieb Georg Baum :
>
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> ATM, the directory LyX is using is "$HOME/Library/Application
>> Support/PACKAGE“
>>
>> PACKAGE is LyX-2.2 on Mac when version suffix „-2.2“ is used.
>
> Looks like QtApplication does something different here than
> QtCor
Stephan Witt wrote:
> You are asking for running tex2lyx in the debugger? Yes, I’m able to do
> so. What should I try exactly?
>
> I started tex2lyx in debugger with these options:
> -f
> -roundtrip
> /Users/stephan/git/lyx/src/tex2lyx/test/algo2e.tex
> /Users/stephan/git/lyx-build/algo2e.lyx
>
Stephan Witt wrote:
> ATM, the directory LyX is using is "$HOME/Library/Application
> Support/PACKAGE“
>
> PACKAGE is LyX-2.2 on Mac when version suffix „-2.2“ is used.
Looks like QtApplication does something different here than
QtCoreApplication.
>> Stephan, does it work? Note that this is not
Am 22.01.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Georg Baum :
>
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> No. It’s not wrong. You’re right with the use of the _own_ userdir
>> for tests. But the real life matters too. It’s the wrong userdir
>> for standard orpeation. And this is Georg message, IMO.
>
> Yes. Also, depending on t
> Am 22.01.2016 um 21:54 schrieb Georg Baum :
>
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> $ lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/bin/Debug/tex2lyx
>> tex2lyx: Not enough arguments.
>> Usage: tex2lyx [options] infile.tex [outfile.lyx]
>> …
>> -sysdir SYSDIR Set system directory to SYSDIR.
>> Default: /Users/stephan/git
Stephan Witt wrote:
> No. It’s not wrong. You’re right with the use of the _own_ userdir
> for tests. But the real life matters too. It’s the wrong userdir
> for standard orpeation. And this is Georg message, IMO.
Yes. Also, depending on the reaason for the wrong default user dir, also the
speci
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 22.01.2016 um 21:01 schrieb Georg Baum
> :
>>
>> Stephan Witt wrote:
>>
>>> There is some change required because tex2lyx has the same problem
>>> itself. I’ve changed this for the lyx binary here:
>>>
>>> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/6e9bd23/lyxgit
>>>
>>> Attach
Stephan Witt wrote:
> $ lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/bin/Debug/tex2lyx
> tex2lyx: Not enough arguments.
> Usage: tex2lyx [options] infile.tex [outfile.lyx]
> …
> -sysdir SYSDIR Set system directory to SYSDIR.
> Default: /Users/stephan/git/lyx/lib/
> -userdir USERDIR Set user directory to USERDIR
Am Freitag, 22. Januar 2016 um 21:01:42, schrieb Georg Baum
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>
> > There is some change required because tex2lyx has the same problem itself.
> > I’ve changed this for the lyx binary here:
> >
> > http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/6e9bd23/lyxgit
> >
> > Attached is a simil
Am 22.01.2016 um 21:01 schrieb Georg Baum :
>
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> There is some change required because tex2lyx has the same problem itself.
>> I’ve changed this for the lyx binary here:
>>
>> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/6e9bd23/lyxgit
>>
>> Attached is a similar change to correct
Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 22.01.2016 um 05:43 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>>
>> Note that if this is a regression and if the tex2lyx test used to work
>> before, it would be very easy to do a 'git bisect'. It could be done
>> automatically by doing 'git bisect run' (When a ctest fails it exits
>> w
Stephan Witt wrote:
> There is some change required because tex2lyx has the same problem itself.
> I’ve changed this for the lyx binary here:
>
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/6e9bd23/lyxgit
>
> Attached is a similar change to correct it for tex2lyx. Ok to commit?
I do not understand why th
Am Freitag, 22. Januar 2016 um 13:34:41, schrieb Stephan Witt
> >> Ah, now we are getting somewhere. The systemdir is fine, the userdir is
> >> wrong. It should be
> >>
> >> /Users/stephan/Library/Application Support/LyX/
> >
> > Wrong. For tests we use _own_ userdir "/Testing.lyx"
> > We do no
Am 22.01.2016 um 12:16 schrieb Kornel Benko :
>
> Am Donnerstag, 21. Januar 2016 um 22:24:58, schrieb Georg Baum
>
>> Stephan Witt wrote:
>>
>>> $ lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/bin/Debug/tex2lyx
>>> tex2lyx: Not enough arguments.
>>> Usage: tex2lyx [options] infile.tex [outfile.lyx]
>>> …
>>> -sysdi
Am Donnerstag, 21. Januar 2016 um 22:24:58, schrieb Georg Baum
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>
> > $ lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/bin/Debug/tex2lyx
> > tex2lyx: Not enough arguments.
> > Usage: tex2lyx [options] infile.tex [outfile.lyx]
> > …
> > -sysdir SYSDIR Set system directory to SYSDIR.
> > Defaul
Am 21.01.2016 um 22:24 schrieb Georg Baum :
>
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> $ lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/bin/Debug/tex2lyx
>> tex2lyx: Not enough arguments.
>> Usage: tex2lyx [options] infile.tex [outfile.lyx]
>> …
>> -sysdir SYSDIR Set system directory to SYSDIR.
>> Default: /Users/stephan/git/ly
> Am 22.01.2016 um 05:43 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:24:58PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
>
>> Does LyX itself tell the correct userdir for both cases? I am now pretty
>> sure that support::Package or some related code is broken on OS X, at least
>> for tex2lyx, which
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:24:58PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Does LyX itself tell the correct userdir for both cases? I am now pretty
> sure that support::Package or some related code is broken on OS X, at least
> for tex2lyx, which means that this is not only a minor test issue, but a
> beta
Stephan Witt wrote:
> $ lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/bin/Debug/tex2lyx
> tex2lyx: Not enough arguments.
> Usage: tex2lyx [options] infile.tex [outfile.lyx]
> …
> -sysdir SYSDIR Set system directory to SYSDIR.
> Default: /Users/stephan/git/lyx/lib/
> -userdir USERDIR Set user directory to USERDIR
> Am 20.01.2016 um 22:31 schrieb Georg Baum :
>
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
>> Am Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2016 um 06:58:20, schrieb Georg Baum
>>
>>> Stephan Witt wrote:
>>>
Me too - I really meant *somewhere* -
perhaps tex2lyx reads some file from outside the build directory.
>>>
>>> No.
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2016 um 06:58:20, schrieb Georg Baum
>
>> Stephan Witt wrote:
>>
>> > Me too - I really meant *somewhere* -
>> > perhaps tex2lyx reads some file from outside the build directory.
>>
>> No. It reads from the system LyX dir which is the source dir whe
Am Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2016 um 06:58:20, schrieb Georg Baum
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>
> > Am 19.01.2016 um 20:10 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:10:59AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> >>
> >>> BTW, when debugging tex2lyx it complains about missing USERDIR and I
> >>
Am Dienstag, 19. Januar 2016 um 14:10:09, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:10:59AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
> > I have this:
> >
> > $ cat
> > /Users/stephan/git/lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/Testing/.lyx/layouts/testalgorithm2e.layout
> >
> > #% Do not delete the line bel
Am Dienstag, 19. Januar 2016 um 08:10:59, schrieb Stephan Witt
> Am 19.01.2016 um 05:13 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:53:26PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> >> Am 18.01.2016 um 21:48 schrieb Kornel Benko :
> >>>
> >>> Am Montag, 18. Januar 2016 um 15:26:06, schrieb S
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 19.01.2016 um 20:10 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:10:59AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>
>>> BTW, when debugging tex2lyx it complains about missing USERDIR and I
>>> have to add -userdir
>>> /Users/stephan/git/lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/Testing/
Am 19.01.2016 um 20:10 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:10:59AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> I have this:
>>
>> $ cat
>> /Users/stephan/git/lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/Testing/.lyx/layouts/testalgorithm2e.layout
>>
>> #% Do not delete the line below; configure depends
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:10:59AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> I have this:
>
> $ cat
> /Users/stephan/git/lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/Testing/.lyx/layouts/testalgorithm2e.layout
>
> #% Do not delete the line below; configure depends on this
> # \DeclareLaTeXClass{testalgorithm2e}
> Format 55
>
Am 19.01.2016 um 05:13 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:53:26PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 18.01.2016 um 21:48 schrieb Kornel Benko :
>>>
>>> Am Montag, 18. Januar 2016 um 15:26:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>>>
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:23:47PM +0100, Stephan
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:53:26PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 18.01.2016 um 21:48 schrieb Kornel Benko :
> >
> > Am Montag, 18. Januar 2016 um 15:26:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:23:47PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> >>> Running ctest there are 16 failed tes
Am 18.01.2016 um 21:48 schrieb Kornel Benko :
>
> Am Montag, 18. Januar 2016 um 15:26:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:23:47PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> Running ctest there are 16 failed tests in tex2lyx.
>>> Is this to be expected?
>>
>> I don't think so. All
Am Montag, 18. Januar 2016 um 15:26:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:23:47PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> > Running ctest there are 16 failed tests in tex2lyx.
> > Is this to be expected?
>
> I don't think so. All of the tex2lyx tests pass for me.
Here too.
> > Where
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:23:47PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Running ctest there are 16 failed tests in tex2lyx.
> Is this to be expected?
I don't think so. All of the tex2lyx tests pass for me.
> Where are the details to analyze it further?
In the CMake build directory, look at
Testing/Te
48 matches
Mail list logo
