Re: [Patch] outline + undo (Re: TOC-crach backtrace)

2006-11-16 Thread Martin Vermeer
Quoting Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: José Matos wrote: On Wednesday 15 November 2006 12:11 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I think that I have not tested it either, but I did test the 1.4 version and see no reason why it should not work. Fair enough. :-) So accepting it is an ac

Re: [Patch] outline + undo (Re: TOC-crach backtrace)

2006-11-16 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
José Matos wrote: On Wednesday 15 November 2006 12:11 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I think that I have not tested it either, but I did test the 1.4 version and see no reason why it should not work. Fair enough. :-) So accepting it is an act of faith :) I am a man of faith, but not t

Re: [Patch] outline + undo (Re: TOC-crach backtrace)

2006-11-15 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
José Matos wrote: On Wednesday 15 November 2006 12:11 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I think that I have not tested it either, but I did test the 1.4 version and see no reason why it should not work. Fair enough. :-) So accepting it is an act of faith :) I am a man of faith, but not t

Re: [Patch] outline + undo (Re: TOC-crach backtrace)

2006-11-15 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: José> On Wednesday 15 November 2006 12:11 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes José> wrote: >> I think that I have not tested it either, but I did test the 1.4 >> version and see no reason why it should not work. José> Fair enough. :-) >> So accepting

Re: [Patch] outline + undo (Re: TOC-crach backtrace)

2006-11-15 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 12:11 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I think that I have not tested it either, but I did test the 1.4 > version and see no reason why it should not work. Fair enough. :-) > So accepting it is an act of faith :) I am a man of faith, but not that much. ;-) The

Re: [Patch] outline + undo (Re: TOC-crach backtrace)

2006-11-15 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: José> On Monday 13 November 2006 2:11 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> The bug is: do some random up/down in outline, mixed with some >> undo. Either the text becomes a mess, or one gets a crash. José> What do you think of this patch Jean

Re: [Patch] outline + undo (Re: TOC-crach backtrace)

2006-11-15 Thread José Matos
On Monday 13 November 2006 2:11 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > The bug is: do some random up/down in outline, mixed with some > undo. Either the text becomes a mess, or one gets a crash. What do you think of this patch Jean-Marc? > JMarc -- José Abílio

Re: [Patch] outline + undo (Re: TOC-crach backtrace)

2006-11-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Abdelrazak> I don't even remember what problem this patch fixes... And Abdelrazak> I don't have the time to do this right now. The bug is: do some random up/down in outline, mixed with some undo. Either the text becomes a mess, o

Re: [Patch] outline + undo (Re: TOC-crach backtrace)

2006-11-13 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Martin Vermeer wrote: On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 07:19 +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:06:00 +0100 Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 11:09 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Martin" == Martin Ver

[Patch] outline + undo (Re: TOC-crach backtrace)

2006-11-13 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 07:19 +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:06:00 +0100 Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> Martin Vermeer wrote: > >>> On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 11:09 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Martin" == M

Re: TOC-crach backtrace

2006-11-11 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Martin Vermeer wrote: On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:06:00 +0100 Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 11:09 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> Before going to work on this, consider the

Re: TOC-crach backtrace

2006-11-11 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:06:00 +0100 Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 11:09 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Martin> Before going to work on this, consider the patch

Re: TOC-crach backtrace

2006-11-10 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Martin Vermeer wrote: On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 11:09 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> Before going to work on this, consider the patch (for 1.4) Martin> that I submitted a while ago and may be relevant. Attached Martin> again. Marti

Re: TOC-crach backtrace

2006-11-10 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 11:09 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Martin> Before going to work on this, consider the patch (for 1.4) > Martin> that I submitted a while ago and may be relevant. Attached > Martin> again. > > Martin, I

Re: TOC-crach backtrace

2006-11-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> Before going to work on this, consider the patch (for 1.4) Martin> that I submitted a while ago and may be relevant. Attached Martin> again. Martin, I finally tested your patch! Better late than never... It works as advertised.

Re: TOC-crach backtrace

2006-11-05 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 05:25:37PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Alex wrote: > >Dear Sirs, > > > >I can reproduce any time: > >1. start lyx1.5.0svn > >2. create 1 section > >3. Insert TOC > >4. click on TOC inset > > > >I have attached a small backtrace and some info about the compile. > > > >I

Re: TOC-crach backtrace

2006-11-05 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Alex wrote: Dear Sirs, I can reproduce any time: 1. start lyx1.5.0svn 2. create 1 section 3. Insert TOC 4. click on TOC inset I have attached a small backtrace and some info about the compile. Is it enough? What to do more? You report is perfect. Even though I cannot reproduce the crash on