Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > that was the second check you forced me to do :)
>
> Sorry?
"doublecheck" in mails above. p
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 02:07:39PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > only an environment variable is
> > added before launching converters.
>
> yep thats what i meant; went only smoothly though those parts
> and saw new code around startscript/process fucntions.
> looking a
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> only an environment variable is
> added before launching converters.
yep thats what i meant; went only smoothly though those parts
and saw new code around startscript/process fucntions.
looking again, there is always path.empty()?, so it should
be ok... that was the sec
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:39:21AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > i would be more careful about the
> > > systemcall part, it looks quite invasive and in very sensitive area of
> > > code.
> >
> > Uh? What do you mean?
>
> to double check anything which touches Syste
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > i would be more careful about the
> > systemcall part, it looks quite invasive and in very sensitive area of code.
>
> Uh? What do you mean?
to double check anything which touches SystemCallXXX::
pavel
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:06:17AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
> >> To conclude, note that even if the patch may seem large, it is really
> >> simple and not invasive, such that it can be safely backported to branch.
> >>
> > What's the policy as regards preference changes? We
Richard Heck wrote:
>> To conclude, note that even if the patch may seem large, it is really
>> simple and not invasive, such that it can be safely backported to branch.
>>
> What's the policy as regards preference changes? We don't need to add this
> to prefs2prefs, or increase the preferences fo
On 5/9/11 7:37 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 10:39:18AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
On 05/08/2011 02:45 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
The \input@path mechanism (already used by LyX) is not always sufficient
and there are cases where a file can be found by LaTeX and also by
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 10:39:18AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 05/08/2011 02:45 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > The \input@path mechanism (already used by LyX) is not always sufficient
> > and there are cases where a file can be found by LaTeX and also by other
> > ancillary programs (such as
On 05/08/2011 02:45 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> The \input@path mechanism (already used by LyX) is not always sufficient
> and there are cases where a file can be found by LaTeX and also by other
> ancillary programs (such as dvi previewers) only if the document dir is
> placed in the TEXINPUTS
10 matches
Mail list logo
