Abdelrazak Younes ha scritto:
I've played with it a bit together with Tommaso (off-list).
Confirmed. I made an attempt of refactory of the overall logics,
completely getting rid of the par height estimates, replaced by
appropriate loops summing up heights. This of course
ended up in a perfectly
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:16:47 +0200
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Helge Hafting wrote:
> > Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >> Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> >>> Hi!
> >>>
...
> >>> Of course the whole approach only works if the cache is filled
> >>> (enough) with real heights. This is no
Helge Hafting wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
It seems that a big annoyance for many people is the bad scrolling in
1.5 and 1.6. The paragraph heights are estimated by some tricky logic
which more or less takes the average of the visible paragraphs. The
bug repo
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
It seems that a big annoyance for many people is the bad scrolling in
1.5 and 1.6. The paragraph heights are estimated by some tricky logic
which more or less takes the average of the visible paragraphs. The
bug report: http://bugzilla.ly
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
It seems that a big annoyance for many people is the bad scrolling in
1.5 and 1.6. The paragraph heights are estimated by some tricky logic
which more or less takes the average of the visible paragraphs. The bug
report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2426
