Re: Signal handling on Windows

2005-01-24 Thread John Weiss
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 10:12:25AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > > > I've been trying out the signal handler on Windows. Executive summary: > > SIGFPE and SIGSEGV are handled properly. The other signals are > > essentially useless on Windows machines. However, the Windows ta

Re: Signal handling on Windows

2005-01-19 Thread Angus Leeming
Angus Leeming wrote: > I've been trying out the signal handler on Windows. Executive summary: > SIGFPE and SIGSEGV are handled properly. The other signals are > essentially useless on Windows machines. However, the Windows task > manager will apparently post a WM_CLOSE message to LyX before wackin