How ironic, a python file to give scons a hard time. ;-)
The problem is like this: lyx2lyx_version.py is generated by
lyx2lyx_version.py.in so 'scons install' generates and install
lyx2lyx_version.py. At the same time, scons globs files under lyx2lyx
and install them. If there is already a lyx
On Sunday 13 August 2006 14:39, Bo Peng wrote:
> Yes. But distributing some extra files is not too bad at the current
> stage. It was the autotools generated lyx2lyx_version.py that gave
> scons a hard time.
How ironic, a python file to give scons a hard time. ;-)
Bo if you have a better sugg
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Good, although the main problems are IMO not mixing of autotools
>> and scons, but having some test files laying around.
Bo> Yes. But distributing some extra files is not too bad at the
Bo> current stage. It was the autotools generated lyx2lyx_
Good, although the main problems are IMO not mixing of autotools and scons,
but having some test files laying around.
Yes. But distributing some extra files is not too bad at the current
stage. It was the autotools generated lyx2lyx_version.py that gave
scons a hard time.
s/Lars/Jean-Marc/
J
Am Sonntag, 13. August 2006 06:59 schrieb Bo Peng:
> Dear list,
>
> The scons system has been changed to use explicit filelist, instead of
> globing them dynamically. This will reduce errors due to the mixed use
> of autotools and scons. Please test, and remember to update
> development/scons/scon
Bo Peng wrote:
Dear list,
The scons system has been changed to use explicit filelist, instead of
globing them dynamically. This will reduce errors due to the mixed use
of autotools and scons.
I guess you've been bitten by the generated files (version.C, etc). If
you select build_dir != src_di
