> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Michael Schmitt wrote:
>> Hi, I prepared two small test cases for s+r problems. The first one
>> is related to mathed (math text is replaced endlessly), the second
>> one demonstrates that "replace all" sometimes misses some
>>
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I prepared two small test cases for s+r problems. The first one is
> related to mathed (math text is replaced endlessly), the second one
> demonstrates that "replace all" sometimes misses some occurrences. It
> happens very seldom but it is easily reproducible.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 03:22:36PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> >it (this bug sounds familiar to me).
>
> I think that this is matheds problem Andre could you have a look at this?
As I can reproduce this without using any math it does not look like my
fault. Search for 'ss' in the attached doc.
Michael Schmitt wrote:
Hi Michael!
> just some short information (I have not managed to prepare nice-looking test
> cases yet).
>
> First of all: The new S+R code is very fast. It seems to work in most cases
> but nonetheless there are at least two problems:
#:O)
> 1. Given a math formular in
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> I will patch my 1.2.1cvs this evening. Since I use LyX excessively at the
> moment, we could agree on waiting for a week or so and see whether I get
> into trouble. When processing smaller docs, I could run valgrind to make
> sure that S+R does not corrupt the memory.
Goo
Hi Jean Marc,
> Juergen> Jean-Marc if you think you want this let me know and I apply
> Juergen> it with some ChangeLog entries :)
>
> What does this patch do? It is a bit large for my taste? How confident
> are you that it actually works?
I will patch my 1.2.1cvs this evening. Since I use LyX
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Michael Schmitt wrote:
>> Hi Jürgen,
Juergen> Hi Michael!
>> I tend you use 1.2.x instead 1.3.0. How big is your S+R patch? Can
>> it be back-ported to 1.2.1cvs? If you can send me a patch against
>> 1.2.1cvs, I will give it
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
Hi Michael!
> I tend you use 1.2.x instead 1.3.0. How big is your S+R patch? Can it be
> back-ported to 1.2.1cvs? If you can send me a patch against 1.2.1cvs, I
> will give it a try. If it takes too long for you to prepare such a
> patch, you could give me
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:55:31AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Well I had a look into the sourcecode (as I had a spare minute)
> and discovered that the changes to S+R have been already commited
> by Lars quite some time ago. Strange nobody noticed??? Did the
> patch not work or is nobody using
