Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | I thnk that adding a couple of ? should do that.
>> | // A valid environment variable is defined as
>> | // $\{?[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z_0-9]*\}?
>> | Do you agree?
>>
>> $\{?[[:alpha:]][[:word:]]*\}?
>>
>> bett
On Friday 26 September 2003 10:03 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> I thnk that adding a couple of ? should do that. // A valid
> Angus> environment variable is defined as //
> Angus> $\{?[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z_0-9]*\}? Do you agree?
>
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> I thnk that adding a couple of ? should do that. // A valid
Angus> environment variable is defined as //
Angus> $\{?[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z_0-9]*\}? Do you agree?
Does this really make sure that the {} match? It is probably good
enough, t
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | I thnk that adding a couple of ? should do that.
> | // A valid environment variable is defined as
> | // $\{?[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z_0-9]*\}?
> | Do you agree?
>
> $\{?[[:alpha:]][[:word:]]*\}?
>
> better?
I have to admit that I am not familiar with thes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| | I thnk that adding a couple of ? should do that.
| | // A valid environment variable is defined as
| | // $\{?[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z_0-9]*\}?
| | Do you agree?
>
| $\{?[[:alpha:]][[:word:]]
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I thnk that adding a couple of ? should do that.
| // A valid environment variable is defined as
| // $\{?[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z_0-9]*\}?
| Do you agree?
$\{?[[:alpha:]][[:word:]]*\}?
better?
http://www.boost.org/libs/regex/syntax.htm#synta
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This is very nice. The only possible improvement would be to allow the
> omission of curly brackets in cases where there is no ambiguity.
>
> That would mean that, beside this case:
> + // A valid environment variable is defined as
> + // $\{[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z_0
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> I've rewritten ReplaceEnvironmentPath in a sane manner and got
Angus> rid of lstrings.[Ch] regexMatch because nothing was using it.
This is very nice. The only possible improvement would be to allow the
omission of curly brackets i
Angus Leeming wrote:
> I have committed this. Please report any failures.
(Don't worry, I didn't commit lib/external_templates which somehow made its
way into the diff.)
--
Angus
