Am 03.11.2010 um 12:13 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> People should have two checkout: branch and trunk, period.
I have three:
* branch,
* trunk for work and another
* trunk for trying out my patches before posting to list.
Stephan
On 11/03/2010 03:17 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
True but this is a drawback that comes from our linear development model.
As soon as we switch to "one feature = one branch" then citing branch or a
tag (don't forget that git tags are real tags) will be just fine. No more
needs to cite a commit.
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> there is also compromise possible - we freeze until the horrible number of
>> bugs
>> shrinks somewhat.
>>
>
> Do you have numbers? I am not sure trunk is so full of bugs when compared
> to pre-1.6 or pre-1.5... I am quite sure though that the first 1.5 or 1.6
i
On 11/03/2010 01:27 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
It's the job of the
maintainer to recall the relevent developer his duty with regards to the
branch bug fixing. And Juergen is very goo at it. Artificially imposing a
not convincing. in many bugs its hard to decide wh
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> It's the job of the
> maintainer to recall the relevent developer his duty with regards to the
> branch bug fixing. And Juergen is very goo at it. Artificially imposing a
not convincing. in many bugs its hard to decide whose is in charge and they
just stay.
> limit o
