Re: Re: building 2.1.2 failed on Debian/unstable

2014-09-25 Thread Pavel Sanda
Sven Hoexter wrote: > It's interesting especially in the light of a recent discussion in > Debian which of the "traditional" Unix tools should no longer have > priority standard and thus be installed as a default. Do you have a link to some summary? P

Re: Re: building 2.1.2 failed on Debian/unstable

2014-09-25 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 06:11:34PM +0100, José Matos wrote: > On Thursday 25 September 2014 11:09:47 Sven Hoexter wrote: Hey, > > You rock! Thanks, it was indeed a missing build-depedency on bc. > > That requirement is there for all the 2.1.x releases. Until I found that it > was bc that missin

Re: Re: building 2.1.2 failed on Debian/unstable

2014-09-25 Thread José Matos
On Thursday 25 September 2014 11:09:47 Sven Hoexter wrote: > You rock! Thanks, it was indeed a missing build-depedency on bc. > > Cheers, > Sven That requirement is there for all the 2.1.x releases. Until I found that it was bc that missing it was a huge headache. :-) https://apps.fedoraproject