On Tuesday 24 March 2015 10:37:18 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Thanks. I adapted your code and came up with a patch that I pushed to
> master.
Thank you. :-)
> Everything should work now. Please complain if you find a bug.
>
> Note that now configure just dies if no suitable python interpreter
On Wednesday 11 March 2015 20:57:43 Kornel Benko wrote:
> Thank you José. If I understood correctly, the opposite of 'open(..,"r")'
> should be 'open(..,"w")'.
> (See development/cmake/po/dos2unix.py:15)
> With also this extra change the script worked too.
>
> Kornel
Note that as you fou
On Wednesday 11 March 2015 15:08:32 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Dear José,
>
> I took a quick look and I need help. The complicated macro for python
> eventually calls:
>
> # AM_PYTHON_CHECK_VERSION(PROG, VERSION, [ACTION-IF-TRUE],
> [ACTION-IF-FALSE])
> #
> -
On Saturday 14 March 2015 14:53:17 Ian Wilder wrote:
> have you guys thought about using Python 2to3?
>
> https://docs.python.org/2/library/2to3.html
>
> even if you don't use the result, it may give a good direction for
> problems that arise.
Bah.. too 2010... ;-)
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel
On Wednesday 11 March 2015 16:28:30 Kornel Benko wrote:
> This is probably trivial, but I could not see the error in dos2unix.py.
> ...
> cd /usr/BUILD/BuildLyxGitQt5/po && /usr/bin/python3
> /usr/src/lyx/lyx-git/development/cmake/po/dos2unix.py
> /usr/BUILD/BuildLyxGitQt5/po/lyx2.2.cat_tmp.pot
>
On Tuesday 10 March 2015 18:31:04 Kornel Benko wrote:
> I've done that. Using python 3.3 is premature anyway, because at least
> lyx_pot.py does not work.
After the last commit this error does happen anymore but there are others
related with the fact that all strings in python3 are unicode whil
On Tuesday 10 March 2015 17:18:48 Kornel Benko wrote:
> I am ready. What should we prefer, 2.7 or 3.3+ ?
>
> Kornel
I suggest 2.7 for lyx 2.2 and 3.3+ for later lyx releases.
I suggest python 2 by default for lyx 2.2 because that is where most (all for
now) tests and users are.
Regards
On Tuesday 10 March 2015 15:15:31 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> For autoconf, I saw the message, it is on my virtual todo list.
>
> JMarc
Thank you Jean-Marc. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Monday 23 February 2015 16:31:27 Kornel Benko wrote:
> I would take care of it, when it becomes a requirement.
>
> Kornel
I have committed the first patch towards this goal.
Because of a mistake (the email was unset) it will not show in the commits
mailing list.
The patch committed
