On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:55:07AM +1800, Bo Peng wrote:
> > How "offically"? "Cygwin official" or "Trolltech offcial"?
>
> If someone adds 'official' cygwin/qt4 to cygwin, I will be able to
> release lyx1.5.x/lyx officially. Maybe Enrico can step in. :-)
The point is that the Cygwin maintainers
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 08:52:21PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 04:46:57PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:04:15PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >
> > > Have you ever ask Trolltech to incoparate your patches, even when not
> > > supporting cy
> How "offically"? "Cygwin official" or "Trolltech offcial"?
If someone adds 'official' cygwin/qt4 to cygwin, I will be able to
release lyx1.5.x/lyx officially. Maybe Enrico can step in. :-)
Bo
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 04:46:57PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:04:15PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>
> > Have you ever ask Trolltech to incoparate your patches, even when not
> > supporting cygwin officially?
>
> No, I have not. I don't think they are interested an
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:04:15PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Have you ever ask Trolltech to incoparate your patches, even when not
> supporting cygwin officially?
No, I have not. I don't think they are interested and, anyway, only
very minimal patches are needed when building for Cygwin/X11.
S
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 08:48:30AM +, José Matos wrote:
Hello,
I saw this yesterday
http://blog.gwright.org.uk/articles/2008/01/21/qt-windows-and-cygwin
I think that the congratulations goes mostly to Enrico. :-)
It is funny to have some other free
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 08:48:30AM +, José Matos wrote:
> Hello,
> I saw this yesterday
>
> http://blog.gwright.org.uk/articles/2008/01/21/qt-windows-and-cygwin
>
> I think that the congratulations goes mostly to Enrico. :-)
>
> It is funny to have some other free software projec
