On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 03:50:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Kewl, that got a bit further... Now, if anyone has any ideas why it
> | still won't compile qt, your help would be greatly appreciated!
> | Thanks! (dump below).
>
> Me to... I have a linker failer with qt that I cannot fig
R. Lahaye wrote:
> I don't know about QT; haven't done that part. Someone else
> may comment to that.
Before you investigate further: the QT-version is broken in pre4 and CVS and
as far as I understand John, it is not very likely to get fixed before 1.2.0.
Anyway, the QT port is not complete an
Brett Randall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2002 20:01:14 +0900, "R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>said:
>
>> I don't know about QT; haven't done that part. Someone else may
>> comment to that.
>
| Kewl, that got a bit further... Now, if anyone has any ideas why it
| still won
Brett Randall wrote:
>
> "R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > I don't know about QT; haven't done that part. Someone else may
> > comment to that.
>
> Kewl, that got a bit further... Now, if anyone has any ideas why it
> still won't compile qt, your help would be greatly appreciated!
> T
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2002 20:01:14 +0900, "R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>said:
> I don't know about QT; haven't done that part. Someone else may
> comment to that.
Kewl, that got a bit further... Now, if anyone has any ideas why it
still won't compile qt, your help would be greatly appreciate
Brett Randall writes:
>
> I am fairly new to LyX, but I am now going to be using extensively as
> part of my studies (ie at a minimum of the next 5 years). As such, I
> want to have nice, smooth fonts to read on my screen because the
> harsh, disgusting looking fonts that xforms uses just really