Re: QT Testing

2002-04-28 Thread John Levon
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 03:50:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | Kewl, that got a bit further... Now, if anyone has any ideas why it > | still won't compile qt, your help would be greatly appreciated! > | Thanks! (dump below). > > Me to... I have a linker failer with qt that I cannot fig

Re: QT Testing

2002-04-28 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
R. Lahaye wrote: > I don't know about QT; haven't done that part. Someone else > may comment to that. Before you investigate further: the QT-version is broken in pre4 and CVS and as far as I understand John, it is not very likely to get fixed before 1.2.0. Anyway, the QT port is not complete an

Re: QT Testing

2002-04-28 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Brett Randall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Sun, 28 Apr 2002 20:01:14 +0900, "R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >said: > >> I don't know about QT; haven't done that part. Someone else may >> comment to that. > | Kewl, that got a bit further... Now, if anyone has any ideas why it | still won

Re: QT Testing

2002-04-28 Thread R. Lahaye
Brett Randall wrote: > > "R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > I don't know about QT; haven't done that part. Someone else may > > comment to that. > > Kewl, that got a bit further... Now, if anyone has any ideas why it > still won't compile qt, your help would be greatly appreciated! > T

Re: QT Testing

2002-04-28 Thread Brett Randall
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2002 20:01:14 +0900, "R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >said: > I don't know about QT; haven't done that part. Someone else may > comment to that. Kewl, that got a bit further... Now, if anyone has any ideas why it still won't compile qt, your help would be greatly appreciate

Re: QT Testing

2002-04-28 Thread R. Lahaye
Brett Randall writes: > > I am fairly new to LyX, but I am now going to be using extensively as > part of my studies (ie at a minimum of the next 5 years). As such, I > want to have nice, smooth fonts to read on my screen because the > harsh, disgusting looking fonts that xforms uses just really