On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 05:51:46PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 09:24:13PM +, John Levon wrote:
> | > > It is off in pre-builds and release.
> | >
> | > Yet there's lots of people using CVS/SVN and not necessarily
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> And only one out of ten developpers cares for safe iterators.
Were did you find 10 developpers?
Andre> So it would be more reasonable to let the one switch it on
Andre> explicitly and set the default to 'off'.
It does find bugs,
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 09:24:13PM +, John Levon wrote:
| > > It is off in pre-builds and release.
| >
| > Yet there's lots of people using CVS/SVN and not necessarily knowing
| > about it. Like me.
|
| Me too (I..e. I should know but tend to forge
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 09:24:13PM +, John Levon wrote:
> > It is off in pre-builds and release.
>
> Yet there's lots of people using CVS/SVN and not necessarily knowing
> about it. Like me.
Me too (I..e. I should know but tend to forget about it)
And only one out of ten developpers cares fo
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I prefer the runtime version.
Lars> Let's hold this for a short while and fix it up in 1.5.0svn.
Sure.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Isn't it better to have this message given by configure?
|
| It would be this one then. The output will be:
|
| === The following minor problems have been detected by con
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Isn't it better to have this message given by configure?
It would be this one then. The output will be:
=== The following minor problems have been detected by configure.
=== Please check the messages below before running 'make
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| John> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:00:40PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
| >> > Given your observations, I suspect that the others are all using
| >> the g++ > super-safe iterators; they hav
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| John Levon a écrit :
| > On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:00:40PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
| >
| >>> Given your observations, I suspect that the others are all using the g++
| >>> super-safe iterators; they have to be explicitly turned off when
config
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:00:40PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> > Given your observations, I suspect that the others are all using
>> the g++ > super-safe iterators; they have to be explicitly turned
>> off when configuring the > buil
John Levon a écrit :
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:00:40PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
Given your observations, I suspect that the others are all using the g++
super-safe iterators; they have to be explicitly turned off when configuring the
build.
Can I re-iterate a request to turn this option
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| >John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| >| On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 10:01:51PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | | > It is off in pre-builds and release.
| > | | Yet there's lots of people using CVS/SVN and n
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 10:01:51PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > It is off in pre-builds and release.
|
| Yet there's lots of people using CVS/SVN and not necessarily knowing
| about it. Like me.
I am reluctan
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 10:26:15PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > | Yet there's lots of people using CVS/SVN and not necessarily knowing
| > | about it. Like me.
| >
| > I am reluctant to turn it off... it finds bugs.
|
| Then can we add a big f
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 10:26:15PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Yet there's lots of people using CVS/SVN and not necessarily knowing
> | about it. Like me.
>
> I am reluctant to turn it off... it finds bugs.
Then can we add a big fat warning at the bottom of configure at least?
cheers
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 10:01:51PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > | On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:00:40PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
| > |
| > | > > Given your observations, I suspect that the others are all using the
g++
| > | > > super-safe ite
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 10:01:51PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:00:40PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> |
> | > > Given your observations, I suspect that the others are all using the g++
> | > > super-safe iterators; they have to be explicitly turned off when
>
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:00:40PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
|
| > > Given your observations, I suspect that the others are all using the g++
| > > super-safe iterators; they have to be explicitly turned off when
configuring the
| > > build.
|
| Can I
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:00:40PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Given your observations, I suspect that the others are all using the g++
> > super-safe iterators; they have to be explicitly turned off when
> > configuring the
> > build.
Can I re-iterate a request to turn this option off by d
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 06:11:56PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Wondering what's wrong with the others, or with me.
>
> Given your observations, I suspect that the others are all using the g++
> super-safe iterators; they have to be explicitly turned
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wondering what's wrong with the others, or with me.
Given your observations, I suspect that the others are all using the g++
super-safe iterators; they have to be explicitly turned off when configuring the
build.
Angus
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 04:02:14PM +, Bartek Kostrzewa wrote:
> Out of interest I've compiled lyx 1.4.0cvs adding gprof and did some
> profiling to see why the scrolling was so slow in the qt frontend (and
> it is horribly slow, the gtk frontend is MUCH faster (but I guess also
> much less comp
I've cut it down significantly because the files were 200k lines each.
http://www.tschew.e7even.com/profiles.tar.bz2
--
gimmage: the minimalistic image viewer
http://gimmage.berlios.de
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 04:02:14PM +, Bartek Kostrzewa wrote:
>
>
>>There is one thing that I have to remark: It seems that the QT frontend
>>spends quite exactly twice as much time in isPrintable than the GTK
>>frontend, maybe there is some unnecessary double calling
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 04:02:14PM +, Bartek Kostrzewa wrote:
> There is one thing that I have to remark: It seems that the QT frontend
> spends quite exactly twice as much time in isPrintable than the GTK
> frontend, maybe there is some unnecessary double calling going on? The
> same is true
John Spray wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 16:02 +, Bartek Kostrzewa wrote:
>
>>Out of interest I've compiled lyx 1.4.0cvs adding gprof and did some
>>profiling to see why the scrolling was so slow in the qt frontend (and
>>it is horribly slow, the gtk frontend is MUCH faster (but I guess also
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 16:02 +, Bartek Kostrzewa wrote:
> Out of interest I've compiled lyx 1.4.0cvs adding gprof and did some
> profiling to see why the scrolling was so slow in the qt frontend (and
> it is horribly slow, the gtk frontend is MUCH faster (but I guess also
> much less complete) )
27 matches
Mail list logo
