Re: Problem converting index from 1.5

2008-10-22 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 22:03:01 Enrico Forestieri wrote: > Both LyX 1.5 and 1.6 can process sdccman.lyx just fine. However, your > sdccman-1.6.tex fails to compile because of a missing \usepackage{amsmath}. > I tried exporting to latex from within LyX 1.6 and that worked too. > Then I tried exp

Re: Problem converting index from 1.5

2008-10-21 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 07:01:09PM +0100, José Matos wrote: > As far as I understand there are some problems compiling the resulting latex > files, that is why it returns 1. > > FWIW I am talking about the manual of sdcc that can be found in > http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/sdccman.tgz > > In this

Re: Problem converting index from 1.5

2008-10-21 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 14:15:24 rgheck wrote: > > I've looked through the code a bit, and I'm not sure what's happening > here. I do know that there are inconsistencies, where we return true to > signal an error sometimes and true to signal success other times. So it > may be that this is the p

Re: Problem converting index from 1.5

2008-10-21 Thread rgheck
José Matos wrote: On Thursday 16 October 2008 19:30:51 Enrico Forestieri wrote: Note that \~ is always an accent. In order to get a ~ character, you should use \~{}, and indeed \textasciitilde is defined exactly so. Here José is using the italic correction \/ in place of {}, so the accent wou

Re: Problem converting index from 1.5

2008-10-21 Thread Pavel Sanda
José Matos wrote: > On Thursday 16 October 2008 19:30:51 Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > Note that \~ is always an accent. In order to get a ~ character, you > > should use \~{}, and indeed \textasciitilde is defined exactly so. > > Here José is using the italic correction \/ in place of {}, so the >

Re: Problem converting index from 1.5

2008-10-21 Thread José Matos
On Thursday 16 October 2008 19:30:51 Enrico Forestieri wrote: > Note that \~ is always an accent. In order to get a ~ character, you > should use \~{}, and indeed \textasciitilde is defined exactly so. > Here José is using the italic correction \/ in place of {}, so the > accent would be placed on

Re: Problem converting index from 1.5

2008-10-20 Thread José Matos
On Thursday 16 October 2008 19:29:11 Jan Engelhardt wrote: > Is this supposed to read "~/" in the final document? > If so, should not it have been "\textasciitilde{}/" in the source? No as Enrico said it was supposed to be read as "~ Operator". Changing the \~\/ in the index entries with \textasc

Re: Problem converting index from 1.5

2008-10-16 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:39:08PM -0400, rgheck wrote: > José Matos wrote: > > Hi, > > the file attached shows a problem when converting an index from 1.5 to > > 1.6. > > > > The problem is that the original index is: "\~\/ Operator" the problem > > is > > that the conversion to latex t

Re: Problem converting index from 1.5

2008-10-16 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Thursday 2008-10-16 14:15, José Matos wrote: >On Thursday 16 October 2008 18:18:31 José Matos wrote: >> Hi, >> the file attached shows a problem when converting an index from 1.5 to >> 1.6. >> >> The problem is that the original index is: "\~\/ Operator" the problem >> is Is this su

Re: Problem converting index from 1.5

2008-10-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Even weird is the fact that if the pdf is generated inside lyx it works while > it fails if the file is first exported to latex and then all the generation > is > done outside... :-( A small example would be nice... JMarc

Re: Problem converting index from 1.5

2008-10-16 Thread José Matos
On Thursday 16 October 2008 18:18:31 José Matos wrote: > Hi, > the file attached shows a problem when converting an index from 1.5 to > 1.6. > > The problem is that the original index is: "\~\/ Operator" the problem > is > that the conversion to latex transforms the \~ as an accent int

Re: Problem converting index from 1.5

2008-10-16 Thread rgheck
José Matos wrote: Hi, the file attached shows a problem when converting an index from 1.5 to 1.6. The problem is that the original index is: "\~\/ Operator" the problem is that the conversion to latex transforms the \~ as an accent into unicode character 0303 the tilde accent. Clearl