On Friday 12 July 2002 10:31 am, David Kastrup wrote:
> > I remember in your introduction you mentioned that you'd like people
> > to pay you for your LaTeX services... ?
>
> Sure thing, I am suffocating in all the money sent to me from LyX
> users, and you are right to scald me for all the greed
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 12 July 2002 9:41 am, David Kastrup wrote:
> > > David, I work on LyX for fun.
> >
> > I did not particularly address you. Hmmm, what was the reason I
> > was working on LyX (if you would call it that)?
>
> I remember in your introduction yo
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 12 July 2002 9:41 am, David Kastrup wrote:
> > Well, PNG image support will mean previews will be much more fun, and
> > their loading will not spend an infinite amount of time...
>
> Incidentally, whilst total loading time will remain high,
On Friday 12 July 2002 9:41 am, David Kastrup wrote:
> Well, PNG image support will mean previews will be much more fun, and
> their loading will not spend an infinite amount of time...
Incidentally, whilst total loading time will remain high, actual impact on
the user will be negligible once I
On Friday 12 July 2002 9:41 am, David Kastrup wrote:
> > David, I work on LyX for fun.
>
> I did not particularly address you. Hmmm, what was the reason I was
> working on LyX (if you would call it that)?
I remember in your introduction you mentioned that you'd like people to pay
you for your L
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 12 July 2002 9:12 am, David Kastrup wrote:
> > Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > >>Statistics:
> > > >>285 numbered equations
> > > >>732 pages in the metrics file
> > > >>57 MBytes for the ppm-files
> >
On Friday 12 July 2002 9:12 am, David Kastrup wrote:
> Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Angus Leeming wrote:
> > >>Statistics:
> > >>285 numbered equations
> > >>732 pages in the metrics file
> > >>57 MBytes for the ppm-files
> > >
> > > Experiment with gs -sDEVICE=pnmraw. Does that re
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>
> >>Statistics:
> >>285 numbered equations
> >>732 pages in the metrics file
> >>57 MBytes for the ppm-files
> >>
> > Experiment with gs -sDEVICE=pnmraw. Does that reduce disk footprint
> > much?
>
>
> yes, up 14.5 MBytes
Th
On Friday 12 July 2002 9:06 am, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> >>- equations in floats (caption) are not previewed
> >>maybe all insets???
> >
> > It's possible that my isInsetVisible function won't work on these. Same
> > problem as the tabulars and something that Jürgen might
Angus Leeming wrote:
>>- equations in floats (caption) are not previewed
>>maybe all insets???
>
>
> It's possible that my isInsetVisible function won't work on these. Same
> problem as the tabulars and something that Jürgen might be able to help with.
Well I think you have to inform the I
On Friday 12 July 2002 7:26 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 07:04:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > // top_y is not const because it's reset by getRowNearY.
> > int top_y = bv.text->first_y;
> > Row const * row = bv.text->getRowNearY(top_y);
> >
> > int const
Herbert Voss wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>
>>> Statistics:
>>> 285 numbered equations
>>> 732 pages in the metrics file
>>> 57 MBytes for the ppm-files
>>>
>>
>> Experiment with gs -sDEVICE=pnmraw. Does that reduce disk footprint much?
>
>
>
> yes, up 14.5 MBytes
aehm ... downto ... :-
Angus Leeming wrote:
>>Statistics:
>>285 numbered equations
>>732 pages in the metrics file
>>57 MBytes for the ppm-files
>>
>
> Experiment with gs -sDEVICE=pnmraw. Does that reduce disk footprint much?
yes, up 14.5 MBytes
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Friday 12 July 2002 09:00, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 11 July 2002 7:43 pm, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 July 2002 20:21, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > Ok. Thanks. I'll have a look tomorrow.
> >
> > One more thing: my labels are now redefined,
Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 11 July 2002 9:04 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>>Another small problem:
>>
>>
>>attached are the mathbox and the preview,
>>it's still a bit too deep.
>>
>>Herbert
>>
>
> You mean "Original" doesn't line up with "fürht"? Then modify your copy of
> lyxpreview2ppm
On Thursday 11 July 2002 8:57 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Attached is a "smart loader" for the previews. I'd really, really like
> > interested users --- that's the mathematicians out there who use
>
> /lots/ of
>
> > equations to test it out.
> >
> > It's meant to enab
On Thursday 11 July 2002 9:04 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Another small problem:
>
>
> attached are the mathbox and the preview,
> it's still a bit too deep.
>
> Herbert
You mean "Original" doesn't line up with "fürht"? Then modify your copy of
lyxpreview2ppm.sh. That's why it's a shell script aft
On Thursday 11 July 2002 7:43 pm, Kornel Benko wrote:
> On Thursday 11 July 2002 20:21, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Ok. Thanks. I'll have a look tomorrow.
>
> One more thing: my labels are now redefined, so that the referencies no
> longer match. (You know, "underlines" in labels, see attached)
Some
Angus Leeming wrote:
> One other point (for Jürgen?): I think that a (working) isInsetVisible could
> be used to advantage by BufferView::updateInset. Seems intelligent to only
> redraw insets that are visible...
I think you didn't understand the Row::pos() variable/function. The pos
returning
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 07:04:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> // top_y is not const because it's reset by getRowNearY.
> int top_y = bv.text->first_y;
> Row const * row = bv.text->getRowNearY(top_y);
>
> int const bv_height = bv.painter().paperHeight();
> int heig
Another small problem:
attached are the mathbox and the preview,
it's still a bit too deep.
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Attached is a "smart loader" for the previews. I'd really, really like
> interested users --- that's the mathematicians out there who use
/lots/ of
> equations to test it out.
>
> It's meant to enable you to generate and display the previews with no
> discernible eff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thursday 11 July 2002 20:21, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Ok. Thanks. I'll have a look tomorrow.
One more thing: my labels are now redefined, so that the referencies no longer match.
(You know, "underlines" in labels, see attached)
> Have a nice evening.
You too
On Thursday 11 July 2002 7:32 pm, Kornel Benko wrote:
> On Thursday 11 July 2002 20:04, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Does this cure the problem?
>
> It does. At least I seem to be unable to reproduce it.
>
> There is one feature, which may be changed. If I load a document,
> there is no update of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thursday 11 July 2002 20:04, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Does this cure the problem?
It does. At least I seem to be unable to reproduce it.
There is one feature, which may be changed. If I load a document,
there is no update of the visible formulae on the first
On Thursday 11 July 2002 7:01 pm, Kornel Benko wrote:
> On Thursday 11 July 2002 18:38, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Attached is a "smart loader" for the previews. I'd really, really like
> > interested users --- that's the mathematicians out there who use /lots/
> > of equations to test it out.
>
> S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thursday 11 July 2002 18:38, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Attached is a "smart loader" for the previews. I'd really, really like
> interested users --- that's the mathematicians out there who use /lots/ of
> equations to test it out.
Super!
I tried it and I like
27 matches
Mail list logo
