Re: Please test xforms 0.9999 with lyx 1.2.0cvs and 1.1.6fixcvs

2002-04-04 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 03 April 2002 8:30 pm, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > > > Is there a way to get it to build a shared library? > > > Thanks, > > > Garst > > > > Out of the box? No. Steve says that he forgot that and a fix is in the > > offing. However, I used this little script. No d

Re: Please test xforms 0.9999 with lyx 1.2.0cvs and 1.1.6fixcvs

2002-04-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Duncan Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Building shared libraries is different on lots of platforms. There are quite a | lot of things common to various platforms (compiling with -fPIC) and oodless of | little differences. IMHO libtool is the right thing if you might want to build | a shared

Re: Please test xforms 0.9999 with lyx 1.2.0cvs and 1.1.6fixcvs

2002-04-03 Thread Duncan Simpson
Building shared libraries is different on lots of platforms. There are quite a lot of things common to various platforms (compiling with -fPIC) and oodless of little differences. IMHO libtool is the right thing if you might want to build a shared library and, in my experience, libtool works well

Re: Please test xforms 0.9999 with lyx 1.2.0cvs and 1.1.6fixcvs

2002-04-02 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 9:38 pm, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Hello there, > > > > It would be nice if people could try out the new xforms LGPL release, > > both with 1.1.6 and 1.2.0. If it turns out it works fine (I have no > > reason to suspect otherwise), I would lik

Re: Please test xforms 0.9999 with lyx 1.2.0cvs and 1.1.6fixcvs

2002-04-02 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 06:40:51PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Hello there, > > It would be nice if people could try out the new xforms LGPL release, > both with 1.1.6 and 1.2.0. If it turns out it works fine (I have no > reason to suspect otherwise), I would like to advise to use it

Re: Please test xforms 0.9999 with lyx 1.2.0cvs and 1.1.6fixcvs

2002-04-02 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 4:57 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Andre> I am not talking about removing support for xforms 0.8[89], > | Andre> just making sure that xforms 0.99... works is enough I think.. > | > | That's what I had in mind. > > an

Re: Please test xforms 0.9999 with lyx 1.2.0cvs and 1.1.6fixcvs

2002-04-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Andre> On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 05:41:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes | Andre> wrote: >>> | It would not be too bad if we could say: 'And look, no evil >>> inside'... >>> >>> We will n

Re: Please test xforms 0.9999 with lyx 1.2.0cvs and 1.1.6fixcvs

2002-04-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 05:41:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes Andre> wrote: >> | It would not be too bad if we could say: 'And look, no evil >> inside'... >> >> We will not remove support for xforms 0.88 and 0.89 before 1.2.0 >> a

Re: Please test xforms 0.9999 with lyx 1.2.0cvs and 1.1.6fixcvs

2002-04-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 05:29:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes Andre> wrote: >> | Anyway, we have to sort this out before 1.2.0. >> >> why? Andre> There is always the odd distribution that does not ship LyX for Andre> its dependen

Re: Please test xforms 0.9999 with lyx 1.2.0cvs and 1.1.6fixcvs

2002-04-02 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 05:41:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | It would not be too bad if we could say: 'And look, no evil inside'... > > We will not remove support for xforms 0.88 and 0.89 before 1.2.0 > anyway... that is just not an option. I am not talking about removing support fo

Re: Please test xforms 0.9999 with lyx 1.2.0cvs and 1.1.6fixcvs

2002-04-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 05:29:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> | Anyway, we have to sort this out before 1.2.0. >> >> why? > | There is always the odd distribution that does not ship LyX for its | dependence on Bad XForms. > | It would not be

Re: Please test xforms 0.9999 with lyx 1.2.0cvs and 1.1.6fixcvs

2002-04-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> | Anyway, we have to sort this out before 1.2.0. Lars> why? Because people will want to know. We have to say _something_. JMarc

Re: Please test xforms 0.9999 with lyx 1.2.0cvs and 1.1.6fixcvs

2002-04-02 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 05:29:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | Anyway, we have to sort this out before 1.2.0. > > why? There is always the odd distribution that does not ship LyX for its dependence on Bad XForms. It would not be too bad if we could say: 'And look, no evil inside'...

Re: Please test xforms 0.9999 with lyx 1.2.0cvs and 1.1.6fixcvs

2002-04-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hello | Lars> there, >>> | Lars> | It would be nice if people could try out the new xforms LGPL | Lars> release, | both wi

Re: Please test xforms 0.9999 with lyx 1.2.0cvs and 1.1.6fixcvs

2002-04-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hello Lars> there, >> Lars> | It would be nice if people could try out the new xforms LGPL Lars> release, | both with 1.1.6 and 1.2.0. If it turns out it works Lars> fine (I ha

Re: Please test xforms 0.9999 with lyx 1.2.0cvs and 1.1.6fixcvs

2002-04-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hello there, > | It would be nice if people could try out the new xforms LGPL release, | both with 1.1.6 and 1.2.0. If it turns out it works fine (I have no | reason to suspect otherwise), I would like to advise to use it as | preferred version.

Re: Please test xforms 0.9999 with lyx 1.2.0cvs and 1.1.6fixcvs

2002-04-02 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 06:40:51PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > It would be nice if people could try out the new xforms LGPL release, > both with 1.1.6 and 1.2.0. If it turns out it works fine (I have no > reason to suspect otherwise), I would like to advise to use it as > preferred versi