Re: Patch: default value for new labels

2000-12-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | But splitting the patch will take me time which I could spend fixing bugs. | Besides, the patch is small, and doesn't changes the "core", so it won't | hurt to apply it. I think I have heard that before... Lgb

Re: Patch: default value for new labels

2000-11-30 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 08:05:28PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj&resh;nnes wrote: > | Why not? The second item is a bug fix, and the patch also contains other > | small bug fixes that I didn't mention. For example, if you insert a label to > | a display formula that contains the label, and press cancel,

Re: Patch: default value for new labels

2000-11-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 04:11:18PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | This patch does the following: | > | | > | - Compute a default value for new labels. | > | This feature can be turned off using th

Re: Patch: default value for new labels

2000-11-24 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 07:29:32PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 10:10:07AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > So, what happens if I copy an equation, paste it elsewhere, make a small > > change and then change the label of this new equation? Will that update the > > references

Re: Patch: default value for new labels

2000-11-24 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 10:10:07AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > So, what happens if I copy an equation, paste it elsewhere, make a small > change and then change the label of this new equation? Will that update the > references (cos is shouldn't!) IFF this changes the labels, then you'll be >

Re: Patch: default value for new labels

2000-11-24 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 04:11:18PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj&resh;nnes wrote: > Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | This patch does the following: > | > | - Compute a default value for new labels. > | This feature can be turned off using the label_init_length lyxrc variable > | (which s

Re: Patch: default value for new labels

2000-11-24 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | This patch does the following: | | - Compute a default value for new labels. | This feature can be turned off using the label_init_length lyxrc variable | (which should added to the preferences dialog) | | - When a label in math display/eqnarray is c

Re: Patch: default value for new labels

2000-11-24 Thread Angus Leeming
So, what happens if I copy an equation, paste it elsewhere, make a small change and then change the label of this new equation? Will that update the references (cos is shouldn't!) IFF this changes the labels, then you'll be introducing a bug with this patch, IMO. Incidentally, where would you