Alain Castera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Point 1 :
| Jürgen Vigna wrote :
| > I read all of the above and am still confused. You want to do this all
| > to have WYSIWYG (more or less) on screen isn't it? Why do we need more
| > variables for this?
|
| I don't want to do all this JUST fo
Point 1 :
Jürgen Vigna wrote :
> I read all of the above and am still confused. You want to do this all
> to have WYSIWYG (more or less) on screen isn't it? Why do we need more
> variables for this?
I don't want to do all this JUST for the display, but let's start with
this. My goal is to he
Alain Castera wrote:
[snip]
Unless somebody points me to a better method, I will go on this way as it
seems to me that it is the simplest way to obtain wysiwym display of fixed
width columns in a tabular. When it will be possible to test it, it will
still be time to discard everything ;-)
I read
Jürgen Vigna wrote:
> Anyway I don't really grap what you mean.
Ok, let's try in english ;-) :
In a tabular column, the alignment of a paragraph may be given either by
the "context" (i.e., the setting of the column alignment params, tabular
popup) or the setting of the paragraph itself (paragrap
Alain Castera wrote:
Investigating further on how to display these settings, I am now in
trouble and need your advice :
Tabular is now a case (but not the only one) where the alignment may be
given by the "context" (e.g. the owner of the text inset, or the layout
...). In such case, it is impossi
> Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Block alignment is the default, so you don't need to write
anything.
> Namely, the column specifier is e.g. p{4cm}
> For other alignments, you need to write >{\centering}p{4cm}
Investigating further on how to display these settings, I am now in
troubl
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Yes I still remembered it was an .fr but I couldn't remember the name ;)
And I remember you were in vacation at that time, so no offense, no blame
;-)
> Well before we always had a Block alignment (default) and left was
> only if we selected it in the
Alain Castera wrote:
I am this bad boy, I guess.
Yes I still remembered it was an .fr but I couldn't remember the name ;)
But I am not guilty for that : Earlier, the alignment menu in tabular
proposed Left, Center and Right only, the default being left. As I
promised to implemented "fixed widt
Jürgen wrote :
> Oh I understand now. This is due to the patch written by ???
> (fill name here) which I said I didn't like very much but it
I am this bad boy, I guess.
But I am not guilty for that : Earlier, the alignment menu in tabular
proposed Left, Center and Right only, the default being l
Dekel Tsur wrote:
Block alignment is the default, so you don't need to write anything.
Namely, the column specifier is e.g. p{4cm}
For other alignments, you need to write >{\centering}p{4cm}
Oh I understand now. This is due to the patch written by ???
(fill name here) which I said I didn't like
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:44:20AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Dekel Tsur wrote:
> >Currently, when creating a fixed width column n a tabular,
> >the possible alignments are left, right and center.
> >It is not possible to have block alignment.
> >
> >The following patch fixes that. OK to apply ?
Dekel Tsur wrote:
Currently, when creating a fixed width column n a tabular,
the possible alignments are left, right and center.
It is not possible to have block alignment.
The following patch fixes that. OK to apply ?
What I miss here is the LaTeX output for the BLOCK alignment, I
don't see it
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 06:44:12PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> The following patch fixes that. OK to apply ?
Looks straight forward, doesn't it?
Andre'
PS: White space?
+ setEnabled(column_options_->radio_align_block, !pwidth.zero());
setEnabled(column_options_->radio_valign_top,
13 matches
Mail list logo
