Re: On crashes with gcc 2.96

2002-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 12:23:55AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes John> wrote: >> If I decide that I have to upgrade my compiler to a "better" 2.96 >> (I'd like to avoid 3.0 because others may not have this choice), is >> it possible to gr

Re: On crashes with gcc 2.96

2002-07-05 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 12:23:55AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > If I decide that I have to upgrade my compiler to a "better" 2.96 > (I'd like to avoid 3.0 because others may not have this choice), is it > possible to grab gcc 2.96-0.76 from mdk 8.2 and put it into mdk 8.1? Hmmmph, how is

Re: On crashes with gcc 2.96

2002-07-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hello, >> Lars> | I investigated a bit the crashes I get with gcc 2.96. As Lars Lars> suggested, | they go away if I turn off optimization completely. Lars> Interesting, this

Re: On crashes with gcc 2.96

2002-07-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hello, > | I investigated a bit the crashes I get with gcc 2.96. As Lars suggested, | they go away if I turn off optimization completely. Interesting, this suggests a compiler problem. | Anyway, even without optimization, valgrind has a report