On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 09:02:26AM -0500, Kuba Ober wrote:
> Well, I considered writing it "properly but without switching the keymap",
That's what the Compose key is good for. Compose-"-u gives a nice ü.
Andre'
On Friday 26 March 2004 04:51 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Kuba Ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Thursday 25 March 2004 06:05 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> >> |
> >> >> | Good remark. In this light it actually looks o
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 09:19:49AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Anyway, along the same thinking, you could imagine that pressing
> | Arrow-Left twice quickly would do a 'word-left' and so on. Perhaps a
> | better example would be that
Kuba Ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 25 March 2004 06:05 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> |
>> >> | Good remark. In this light it actually looks ok.
>> >>
>> >> OTOH, do we want it to be that easy to do non-logical m
On Thursday 25 March 2004 06:05 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> |
> >> | Good remark. In this light it actually looks ok.
> >>
> >> OTOH, do we want it to be that easy to do non-logical markup?
>
> Andre> Well, given the existence of
On Thursday 25 March 2004 04:36 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 12:14:26AM +0100, Christian Ridderström
> >
> > wrote:
> >> [...] That *is* ubercool...
> >
> > Just out of interest: I know this usage of 'uber' has 70 year old
> > German roots as in 'Überm
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> OTOH, do we want it to be that easy to do non-logical markup?
>
| Well think of it in xhtml terms. The user *should* specify an external
| style sheet but it is still possible to tweak things:
I am not talking about availa
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 12:00:18PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > And recently I was told Nietsche is dead
>
> Who said that? God?
How should I know?
Andre'
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | Good remark. In this light it actually looks ok.
>>
>> OTOH, do we want it to be that easy to do non-logical markup?
Andre> Well, given the existence of explicit font size/color/whatever
Andre> changes, this should qualify as lesser
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> And recently I was told Nietsche is dead
Who said that? God?
Jürgen.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> OTOH, do we want it to be that easy to do non-logical markup?
Well think of it in xhtml terms. The user *should* specify an external
style sheet but it is still possible to tweak things:
http://validator.w3.org/check/referer";>
--
Angus
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> It's older than that: Nietsche 1883-1885. It only was hijacked 70 years
> ago...
And even older. Nietzsche hijacked it from Novalis, Gothe and Heine. But of
course it became "popular" with Nietzsche's "Also sprach Zarathustra" ("Seht,
ich lehre Euch den Übermenschen! Der
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 12:22:18PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> It's older than that: Nietsche 1883-1885. It only was hijacked 70
> years ago...
Ah... now that you mention it. One tends to forget things...
And recently I was told Nietsche is dead ;-)
Andre'
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 10:54:55AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 03:45:32PM -0500, Kuba Ober wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 24 March 2004 03:20 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 02:56:03PM +0100, Christia
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 10:04:45AM +0100, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 12:14:26AM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > [...] That *is* ubercool...
>
> Just out of interest: I know this usage of 'uber' has 70 year old
> German roots as in 'Übermensch'. 'We' don't use i
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 03:45:32PM -0500, Kuba Ober wrote:
>> On Wednesday 24 March 2004 03:20 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 02:56:03PM +0100, Christian Ridderström
>> > wrote:
>> > > Just out of curiousity, could you exand on why
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 03:45:32PM -0500, Kuba Ober wrote:
>> On Wednesday 24 March 2004 03:20 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 02:56:03PM +0100, Christian Ridderström
>> > wrote:
>> > > Just out of curiousity, could you exand on why
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 12:14:26AM +0100, Christian Ridderström
> wrote:
>> [...] That *is* ubercool...
>
> Just out of interest: I know this usage of 'uber' has 70 year old
> German roots as in 'Übermensch'. 'We' don't use it anymore so it
> seems to be a typical English t
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 12:24:59AM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Helge Hafting wrote:
>
> > Not time-dependent makes all the difference. The idea is good. I didn't
> > know about the math editor trick either, just tried it and found it nice
> > to use.
>
> So people,
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 12:14:26AM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> [...] That *is* ubercool...
Just out of interest: I know this usage of 'uber' has 70 year old
German roots as in 'Übermensch'. 'We' don't use it anymore so it seems
to be a typical English thing nowadays. I just wonder whethe
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 03:45:32PM -0500, Kuba Ober wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 March 2004 03:20 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 02:56:03PM +0100, Christian Ridderström
> > wrote:
> > > Just out of curiousity, could you exand on why? Do you dislike
> > > double-clicking with a mou
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Not time-dependent makes all the difference. The idea is good. I didn't
> know about the math editor trick either, just tried it and found it nice
> to use.
So people, what do you say. Should I add the this as a feature request to
bugzilla?
/Christian
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Kuba Ober wrote:
> We have a very similar and darn useful feature in mathed, namely
> Ctrl+space, space, space ... Why on earth would one see that as a
> problem with plain Enter, I can't fathom. I consider the "variable"
> mathed space to be an ubercool thing
That *is* uberc
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 03:45:32PM -0500, Kuba Ober wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 March 2004 03:20 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 02:56:03PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > > Just out of curiousity, could you exand on why? Do you dislike
> > > double-clicking with a mouse f
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 03:20 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 02:56:03PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > Just out of curiousity, could you exand on why? Do you dislike
> > double-clicking with a mouse for instance?
>
> First, I'd consider this bad UI as well.
>
> Peopl
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 08:46:35AM -0500, Kuba Ober spake thusly:
> We have a very
> similar and darn useful feature in mathed, namely Ctrl+space, space,
> space ... Why on earth would one see that as a problem with plain Enter, I
> can't fathom. I consider the "variable" mathed space to be an
> I'm not sure if you're serious here... however, if two-times deleted a
> word, that *might* feel intuitive, but I feel very uncertain about it.
> Otherwise, there's a difference between the effect of'enter' and
> 'backspace' since 'enter' only has a "meaning" the first time it's
> pressed.
I don
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 02:56:03PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Just out of curiousity, could you exand on why? Do you dislike
> double-clicking with a mouse for instance?
First, I'd consider this bad UI as well.
People are used to the concept of mouse double clicks but not to 'double
k
Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Anyway, along the same thinking, you could imagine that pressing
| Arrow-Left twice quickly would do a 'word-left' and so on. Perhaps a
| better example would be that "dobule-pressing"'HOME moves to the beginning
| of the current paragraph (or th
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> I take back what I said above, especially when it comes to the
> behaviour in Windows when I want to change the name of a file. It drives
> me nuts. First I click on the icon to select it. Then I have to wait a
> while before I can click on the
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >
> >> Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> | Or would this be considered bad UI?
> >>
> >> I would.
>
> | Just out
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Helge Hafting wrote:
> > Just out of curiousity, could you exand on why? Do you dislike
> > double-clicking with a mouse for instance?
> >
> Indeed! There's lots of trouble with it.
> The mouse might slide, turning it into a short drag or something.
> I might be too slow some
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 02:56:03PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | Or would this be considered bad UI?
> >
> > I would.
>
> Just out of curiousity, could you exand on why? Do
Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | Or would this be considered bad UI?
>>
>> I would.
| Just out of curiousity, could you exand on why? Do you dislike
| double-clicki
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Or would this be considered bad UI?
>
> I would.
Just out of curiousity, could you exand on why? Do you dislike
double-clicking with a mouse for instance?
I don't mind double-clicking whe
Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Or would this be considered bad UI?
I would.
--
Lgb
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Things have changed in LyX 1.4.x. You'd use
> Insert->Special Formatting->Vertical Space
> which can be bound to the accelerator key of your choice.
Does any of the GUI (Qt, Xforms) allow you to define shortcuts that takes
the time into consideration, e
> "Martin" == Martin Forsgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> I've got an idéa of a new feature in the gui. As it is now it
Martin> doesn't mather how many enter you press, you still cant get
Martin> more then a new part. Thats good but what if it transformed to
Martin> a vertical space i
Martin Forsgren wrote:
> I've got an idÃa of a new feature in the gui.
> As it is now it doesn't mather how many enter
> you press, you still cant get more then a new
> part. Thats good but what if it transformed to
> a vertical space if you pressed one more enter.
> And if you pressed once more
Martin Forsgren wrote:
Hi, Martin.
> I've got an idéa of a new feature in the gui.
> As it is now it doesn't mather how many enter
> you press, you still cant get more then a new
> part. Thats good but what if it transformed to
> a vertical space if you pressed one more enter.
> And if you press
40 matches
Mail list logo
