2016-10-25 17:13 GMT+02:00 Richard Heck :
> This assumes (!) that the Assumption style is mentioned in the
> description, which it might be. It would be possible, but a whole lot
> more complicated, to filter on the styles, etc, that are declared in the
> module (if any).
>
Or add some sensible k
On 10/25/2016 09:58 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> On 10/25/2016 12:14 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> I think the right approach to fix this is to use categories, like we
>> have in layouts (the interface is already implemented also for
>> modules). This would make it easier to find the module you ar
On 10/25/2016 12:14 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
I think the right approach to fix this is to use categories, like we
have in layouts (the interface is already implemented also for
modules). This would make it easier to find the module you are looking
for (without knowing the exact name, which i
On 25/10/2016 5:14 p.m., Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 25.10.2016, 08:55 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
My concern was for the list of modules to be scannable "at a
glance".
You rightly pointed out in your first post that "the modules dialogue
[...] looks as if it has outgrown i
Am Dienstag, den 25.10.2016, 08:55 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
> My concern was for the list of modules to be scannable "at a
> glance".
> Particularly with the theorems modules there is a clump of them,
> some
> with long names where the distinguishable part of the name is not
> initially vis
Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 21:51 +0200 schrieb racoon:
Ah, I have not made the settings dialog wide enough. Well anyway, the
right part does not become wider up to a certain point (see attached
screenshot). I would call that wasted space. So maybe the list of
settings should be set to a lower
On 25/10/2016 5:53 a.m., Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 13:15 +0200 schrieb racoon:
Sorry, probably the attached is better.
I would prefer a layout where we can maintain the horizontal order
(which we use in all other similar dialogs). Maybe we can wrap the
descriptions t
On 24.10.2016 20:33, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 20:21 +0200 schrieb racoon:
Another idea would be to make not the list of document settings
expand
when one expands the settings dialog. All the settings names already
fit
well into the list. So it would make more sense to
Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 20:21 +0200 schrieb racoon:
> Another idea would be to make not the list of document settings
> expand
> when one expands the settings dialog. All the settings names already
> fit
> well into the list. So it would make more sense to expand the
> individual
> settings a
On 24.10.2016 20:08, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 19:36 +0200 schrieb racoon:
Can you give an example?
Citation dialog.
Oh, I see. Haven't thought about non-settings/preferences dialogs. But
since those are in quite different areas of LyX I would not mind to have
it
Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 19:36 +0200 schrieb racoon:
> Can you give an example?
Citation dialog.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 24.10.2016 18:53, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 13:15 +0200 schrieb racoon:
Sorry, probably the attached is better.
I would prefer a layout where we can maintain the horizontal order
(which we use in all other similar dialogs). Maybe we can wrap the
descriptions to mu
Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 13:15 +0200 schrieb racoon:
> Sorry, probably the attached is better.
I would prefer a layout where we can maintain the horizontal order
(which we use in all other similar dialogs). Maybe we can wrap the
descriptions to multiple lines.
Jürgen
>
> Daniel
>
signature.
On 24.10.2016 13:15, racoon wrote:
On 24.10.2016 12:53, racoon wrote:
On 23.10.2016 10:15, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
Few documents have more than a module or five attached to them. Most of
the Selected window is wasted space. I wonder if the two Defaults
buttons in the penultimate row couldn't be s
On 24.10.2016 12:53, racoon wrote:
On 23.10.2016 10:15, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
Few documents have more than a module or five attached to them. Most of
the Selected window is wasted space. I wonder if the two Defaults
buttons in the penultimate row couldn't be shrunk to fit into the gap in
the bot
On 23.10.2016 10:15, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
In an earlier email I managed to overlook the Assumption environment,
provided in the Theorems-AMS-Extended module, as Paul indicated. OK,
more of this kind of thing is to be expected as I enter my dotage, but
when I view the modules dialogue it looks as
16 matches
Mail list logo
