On Wednesday 27 November 2002 5:05 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > and adding "active_(0)" to the ControlMath c-tor made no difference?
> > Angus
>
> Doing the following upon receipt of this email:
>
> cvs update (noticed that ControlMath.c was patched)
> make(nothing weird)
> lyxdbg
>
> Cli
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 5:05 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 02:34, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 November 2002 3:50 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > > Dear list,
> > >
> > > Because it's a real bug, and to show of^H^H^H^H^H^H^Htest the script I
> > > just posted.
>
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 02:34, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 November 2002 3:50 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > Because it's a real bug, and to show of^H^H^H^H^H^H^Htest the script I
> > just posted.
> >
> > See attachment =)
>
> and adding "active_(0)" to the ControlMath c
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 3:50 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> Because it's a real bug, and to show of^H^H^H^H^H^H^Htest the script I
> just posted.
>
> See attachment =)
and adding "active_(0)" to the ControlMath c-tor made no difference?
Angus
